Monday, November 22, 2021

Sweden: Amendment Requiring Banks to Provide Access to Cash Services Enters into Force


Sweden: Amendment Requiring Banks to Provide Access to Cash Services Enters into Force




(Feb. 5, 2021) On January 1, 2021, an amendment to the Swedish Act on Payment Services (Lagen (SFS 2010:751) om betaltjänster) requiring banks to provide access to cash services entered into force.

The amendment stipulates as follows:


1 § Such credit institutions and branches of foreign credit institutions that supply customers with payment accounts that include basic functions must provide services that make it possible to withdraw cash from these accounts (places for cash withdrawal) to an adequate extent throughout the country.

Such credit institutions and branches of foreign credit institutions that supply businesses with payment accounts that include basic functions must provide services that make it possible to deposit cash into these accounts (places for daily cash deposits) to an adequate extent throughout the country.

The first and second paragraphs apply only to institutions and branches that on July 1 of the preceding year had more than 70 billion kroner [about US$8.4 billion] in deposits from the public.

Under Swedish law, cash is legal tender and the Swedish government must accept it. (5 kap. 1 § Lagen om Sveriges riksbank (SFS 1988:1385).) However, as established by the Swedish Supreme Administrative Court in 2015, businesses and shops are not required to accept cash because the refusal to accept cash or credit cards is within the contractual freedom between businesses and consumers, whereas government entities must accept cash.

In passing the amendment to the Act on Payment Services, the Swedish government and Parliament found that because cash is legal tender, the government also has the duty to ensure that people have “reasonable access” (rimlig tillgång) to cash throughout the country.

As determined in the legislative history of the law, “reasonable access” throughout the country means that


[n]o more than 0.3 percent of the population (about 30,000 persons in 2017) shall have farther than 25 kilometers [about 15.5 miles] to a place for cash withdrawal and no more than 1.22 percent of the population (about 122,000 persons in 2017) shall have farther than 25 kilometers to the closest place for daily cash deposits to their bank account. (Prop. 2019/20:23 Bilaga 1.)

Internationally Sweden has a comparatively low circulation of cash, with only 1.2% of gross domestic product (GDP) in cash in 2018, placing it “at the lowest level of comparable countries.” The government estimates that 0.23% of the population had more than 25 kilometers (km) to the nearest cash service in 2017. According to the same report, the only region where no inhabitant had more than 20 km to the nearest cash service was in Skåne, Sweden’s southernmost region. 0.17% of the population had more than 30 km to the nearest cash service provider. A clear majority of persons with more than 30 km or 40 km to the nearest provider were living in the northern regions of Sweden. 90% of all persons with more than 40 km to the nearest cash service live in the northernmost regions of Jämtland, Norrbotten, and Västerbotten.

Banks or international branches that violate the requirement to provide deposit and withdrawal services are subject to monetary sanctions. The amount of the sanction will consist of the total number of persons affected, to the nearest thousand, who do not have access to deposit or withdrawal services, times the level of deposits from the public to the bank as measured in relation to the total deposits from the public in Sweden, times 5,000 Swedish kroner (about US$600), but must not exceed 10% of the institution’s (or the group’s) total revenue or 5 million euros (about US$6 million). (9 kap. 7–8 §§.)




msdogfood@hotmail.com 



Friday, November 5, 2021

Netherlands: Amsterdam District Court Classifies Uber Drivers as Employees

Netherlands: Amsterdam District Court Classifies Uber Drivers as Employees










On September 13, 2021, the District Court of Amsterdam (Rechtbank Amsterdam) held that the legal relationship between Uber and its drivers meets all the characteristics of an employment contract. As a result, Uber drivers are covered by the collective labor agreement for taxi transport, meaning they are eligible to be paid the hourly wage owed under the agreement, including holiday allowance, a surcharge of 9.7% for holidays not taken, and a surcharge of 20% for overtime. Some drivers might be able to claim back pay. In addition, the court ordered Uber to pay the plaintiff, the Federation of Dutch Trade Unions, compensation in the amount of 50,000 euros (about US$58,680) for failing to comply with the collective labor agreement for taxi transport.

Facts of the Case

The applicant in the case was the Federation of Dutch Trade Unions (Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging, FNV). FNV negotiates and concludes collective labor agreements on behalf of workers and monitors compliance with these agreements. It is a party to the collective labor agreement for taxi transport (CAO Taxivervoer), which has been declared generally binding. (Wet AVV art. 2.) (Case, paras. 1.1., 1.2.) FNV argued that Uber organized the transport services in detail and that Uber drivers were therefore employees of a taxi company. (Para. 3.) As such, they were entitled to back pay under the collective labor agreement for taxi drivers.

The defendant Uber, on the other hand, claimed that it was a technology company only and offered a platform to connect drivers and passengers. It therefore stated that the drivers were self-employed and also questioned whether the drivers even wanted to be considered employees. (Paras. 10–13.)

Decision

The District Court of Amsterdam held that the legal relationship between Uber and its drivers meets all the characteristics of an employment contract, which are set out in section 7:610 of the Dutch Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek). The provision states that “[a]n employment agreement is an agreement under which one of the parties (‘the employee’) engages himself or herself with the opposite party (‘the employer’) to perform work for a period of time in service of this opposite party in exchange for payment.” These requirements were specified by the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) in the cases Groen/Schoevers and X./Gemeente Amsterdam. The court reiterated that an employment contract requires the performance of work, wages, and a relationship of authority (subordination).

With regard to the (personal) performance of work, the court held that “[t]here is no doubt that the drivers work for Uber” as they transport passengers for Uber via the Uber app. (Para. 19.) The court rejected the argument that Uber was a mere technology company offering a platform. Uber drivers must agree to Uber’s terms and conditions to use the platform and offer transport services. The court concluded that the drivers enter into an agreement with Uber to offer transport services. Furthermore, transport services are at the core Uber’s business model. Lastly, Uber ensures that drivers personally perform the work by requiring a selfie before a ride. (Paras. 19–22.)

With regard to wages, the court stated that wages are the agreed consideration for work performed. It held that the fact that the passengers pay the fare to Uber Pay (another entity) and that Uber Pay in turn pays the drivers does not mean that the drivers do not receive a salary from Uber. (Paras. 23, 24.)

Lastly, the court examined the criterion of “authority,” which it determined to be the decisive element of an employment contract. (Para. 25.) It stated that “[i]n today’s technology-dominated age, the criterion of ‘authority’ … deviates from the classical model. Employees have become more independent and perform their work at more variable (self-chosen) times. We hold that the relationship between Uber and the drivers involves this “modern relationship of authority.” (Para. 26.) It explained that drivers are in a position of subordination to Uber as they must accept the non-negotiable terms and conditions to use the Uber app and have no influence on subsequent changes. Furthermore, the algorithm of the Uber app, programmed by Uber, determines how rides are allocated and which priorities are set. Drivers have no influence on the rates for a ride. The court highlighted that the Uber app has a disciplinary effect with low average ratings leading to removal. Even though there is the theoretical possibility to cancel an accepted ride or reject an offered ride, this will lead to exclusion from the app or log the driver off the system. The court concluded that the algorithm of the Uber app has a financial incentive as well as a disciplining and instructing effect. (Paras. 27–33.)

The court held also that Uber must comply with the provisions of the collective labor agreement for taxi transport insofar as they have been declared generally binding, even if the drivers do not wish so. In the court’s view, making the application of generally binding collective agreements dependent on the will of employees would put the effectiveness of the whole system in question. (Para. 42.)

Related Court Decisions

On February 19, 2021, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled that Uber drivers are workers entitled to employment law protections.







Friday, October 29, 2021

In the room where it happens: a conversation with Mark Rutte and Justin ...




Have you ever wanted to share your thoughts with a world leader? This is your chance! On their way to the UN Climate Change Conference (COP26)t in Glasgow, Prime Minister Mark Rutte and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will stop in The Hague to have a conversation with students and young professionals about their priorities. What are your concerns on global peace and justice issues? Do you have questions about how the Dutch and Canadians are tackling climate change? Lingering questions on how we’re continuing the fight against COVID-19 around the world? Or how to create a more inclusive society? This is your chance to ask them! Join us here for an up close and personal conversation with these two world leaders on Friday, October 29th. The leaders will answer questions in person and online, so don’t miss it! Event moderator is former UN Youth Representative Hajar Yakoubi. Her personal goal is to get more young people included in places of decision making in politics. Event is co-organised by Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Municipality of the Hague and Leiden University. Join us. LIVE STREAM Join this dialogue on HagueTalks YouTube channel: https://bit.ly/HTyou 17:0018:30 UTC+1/GMT+1 (Amsterdam) HAGUE TALKS is a meeting place for creative minds, peace inventors and game changers in the field of peace and justice. For more info visit www.haguetalks.com Twitter - https://twitter.com/HagueTalks YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/haguetalks Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/HagueTalks/ Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/haguetalks/ Periscope - https://www.pscp.tv/HagueTalks




Monday, October 11, 2021

Updated version of Rice University’s DIY ventilation unit gets FDA emergency use authorization


Updated version of Rice University’s DIY ventilation unit gets FDA emergency use authorization




A refined version of the do-it-yourself ventilation unit originally designed by undergraduate engineering students at Rice University and further developed by the Houston manufacturer Stewart & Stevenson Healthcare Technologies has won emergency use authorization by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The Apollo ABVM, an automated bag valve mask device, has been approved as an emergency resuscitator for COVID-19 patients in need of a ventilator. Intended as a bridge device for patients who cannot access a traditional ventilator, the programmable Apollo ABVM supplies air into the lungs in a continuous manner until a traditional ventilator is available.

The device, originally created at Rice University’s Oshman Engineering Design Kitchen (OEDK) by undergraduate students, was called the ApolloBVM. But after the COVID-19 pandemic created a global need for medical ventilation alternatives, engineering experts at the OEDK and a Rice undergraduate student joined forces with Rohith Malya, M.D., an assistant professor of emergency medicine at Baylor College of Medicine and an adjunct assistant professor of bioengineering at Rice, to further refine the unit. Instructions for the device are available for download on the Rice University website so that it can be built anywhere in the world—for parts totaling less than $300. According a Rice University news release, the plans have been accessed nearly 3,000 times by individuals in 115 different countries.


The original device called the Apollo BVM was created by Rice University undergraduates.

“We were hearing that there was a crisis, and there was a challenge that needed to be solved,” said OEDK Executive Director Amy Kavalewitz in an interview about the device in April of this year. “…We say all the time that if this device helps one person survive, then every bit of this effort was worth it.”

But the device’s lifespan wouldn’t end there. The design was picked up for manufacturing by Stewart & Stevenson, which enhanced the DIY version into a sturdier system intended to be easily portable for emergencies. According to a news release put out by Stewart & Stevenson, the device “was refined by S&S to meet the standard for FDA emergency use authorization and make it ready for high volume production.”

The FDA emergency use authorization, which allows for the use of unapproved medical products during emergencies to treat life-threatening diseases or conditions when there are no available alternatives, will last for the duration of the emergency circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Joe Reniers, president of Kirby Distribution and Services, of which Stewart & Stevenson is a subsidiary, said in the news release that the emergency use authorization was an important milestone and that the company “can now commence manufacturing and distribution of this low-cost device to the front lines, providing healthcare professionals with a sturdy and portable ventilation device for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.”




Rice University engineers design DIY ventilation unit


Rice University engineers design DIY ventilation unit




As news of ventilator shortages in areas hit hard by COVID-19 grew, a team at Rice University’s Oshman Engineering Design Kitchen (OEDK), together with global health design firm Metric Technologies, worked to refine an easy-to-assemble ventilation unit originally created by undergraduate engineering students.

The ApolloBVM (BVM stands for bag valve mask) is not intended to be used in place of a ventilator when one is available, but rather as a bridge device. While typical bag valve masks pump air into the lungs by hand, this device is automated, making it highly desirable for patients in need of continuous support. The unit is made from easy-to-acquire materials and features adult, child and pediatric settings.








“Our technicians got together with one whiz-kid student and decided to redesign it and make it super simple,” said Amy Kavalewitz, OEDK executive director. “Working with Dr. Rohith Malya from Baylor as our advisor, they redesigned it in a way where, if you had the tools and you had the equipment and you had some basic knowledge of how to build a device, you could put one of these together.”

Malya, an assistant professor of emergency medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, an adjunct assistant professor of bioengineering at Rice and a principal at Metric Technologies, worked closely with Danny Blacker, OEDK’s engineering design supervisor, and Rice University then-senior “whiz-kid” Thomas Herring.

In early April, the team published instructions for the unit online for anyone who wished to build one. Cost for parts is less than $300. Since then, the team has contracted with Houston-based Stewart & Stevenson to manufacture the device, and they are working on emergency approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to begin production.
Tags | ApolloBVM, Baylor College of Medicine, COVID-19, Next Med, OEDK, Oshman Engineering Design Kitchen, Rice University, ventilator









Saturday, October 9, 2021

this is a list of institutions of the Texas Medical Center.

t

his is a list of institutions of the Texas Medical Center. TMC
Patient care institutions
Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, affiliated with and partially owned by Baylor College of Medicine.
Ben Taub General Hospital, part of the Harris Health System, Level 1 trauma hospital affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine (BCM)
Houston Methodist Hospital, affiliated with Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine and Weill Cornell Medical College
John Sealy Hospital, Level 1 trauma center affiliated with UTMB at Galveston [1][2]
Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center, Level 1 trauma center affiliated with McGovern Medical School (formerly UTHealth Medical School)
Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital
Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston, affiliated with BCM
Rebecca Sealy Hospital, part of the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston.[1][2]
Shriner's Hospital for Children — Galveston, burn care unit [1][2]
Shriners Hospitals for Children — Houston
Texas Children's Hospital, affiliated with BCM
TIRR Memorial Hermann, affiliated with BCM and McGovern Medical School
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, affiliated with BCM, McGovern Medical School, UTMB Galveston, and Texas A&M Health Science Center
Educational institutions
Academic and research institutions
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston Academy of Medicine-Texas Medical Center Library
Houston Community College System — Health Science Programs
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston Methodist Research Institute
Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart Center
Methodist Neurological Institute
Center for Cell and Gene Therapy
Prairie View A&M College of Nursing
Rice University-BioScience Research Collaborative
Texas A&M Health Science Center Institute of Biosciences and Technology (IBT)
Texas Children's Hospital
Texas Children's Cancer Center
Texas Heart Institute
Texas Woman's University Institute of Health Sciences, Houston
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston[1][2][3]
Galveston National Laboratory[1][2]
Secondary schools
Michael E. DeBakey High School for Health Professions — named after Michael E. DeBakey
Support facilities[




Gulf Coast Regional Blood Center
John P. McGovern Museum of Health and Medical Science
Ronald McDonald House of Houston
Ronald McDonald House of Galveston
YMCA Child Care Center in the Texas Medical Center
The Menninger Clinic
DePelchin Children's Center
Sabin Vaccine Institute
References


^
"UTMB Joins Texas Medical Center: UTMB Is About 50 Miles Away From Texas Medical Center". KPRC Click2Houston. Archived from the original on 2010-03-04. Retrieved 2010-05-13.^ Jump up to:a b c d e Kappes, Hayley. "UTMB partners with Texas Medical Center". Galveston Daily News. Retrieved 2010-05-13.[permanent dead link]
^ Jump up to:a b c d e WENDLER, RHONDA (2010-03-15). "UTMB-Galveston Now a Texas Medical Center Institution". Texas Medical Center News. Retrieved 2012-04-21.[permanent dead link]








msdogfood@hotmail.com