Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Monday, December 16, 2024
At Issue | Is Freeland’s resignation a fatal blow to Trudeau's government?
Monday, November 18, 2024
Good Talk -- Call The Election Soon?
views Premiered Nov 15, 2024 Good Talk
Donald Trump's win has changed everything so why not change the Canadian election timetable? Thart's Chantal's suggestion this week and it provides a lot of Good Talk with Bruce and me. In fact that suggestion is the basis for the whole hour this week with lots of off ramps into the economy, immigration and Elon Musk.
Sign up to the Buzz Newsletter:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, November 7, 2024
Trump Wins - Again.
No encore edition this Wednesday, instead this is the real deal. Donald Trump is heading back to the White House after a huge win last night over Kamala Harris. What happened? What does it mean? And what happens next? Keith Boag and Bruce Anderson join us for a roundtable on the comeback of the ages. Sign up to the Buzz Newsletter: https://nationalnewswatch.com/thebuzz https://www.siriusxm.ca/TheBridgeCA
msdogfood@hotmail.com
Wednesday, October 30, 2024
Tuesday, October 22, 2024
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, 2024 SCC 26 Citation: Canada (Attorney General)
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Citation: Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, 2024 SCC 26 Appeal Heard: December 7, 2023 Judgment Rendered: July 19, 2024 Docket: 40241 Between: Attorney General of Canada Appellant and Joseph Power Respondent - and - Attorney General of Ontario, Attorney General of Quebec, Attorney General of Nova Scotia, Attorney General of New Brunswick, Attorney General of Manitoba, Attorney General of British Columbia, Attorney General of Prince Edward Island, Attorney General of Saskatchewan, Attorney General of Alberta, Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador, Fisher River Cree Nation, Sioux Valley Dakota Nation, Manto Sipi Cree Nation, Lake Manitoba First Nation, Quebec Native Women Inc., Speaker of the Senate, David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights, Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Canadian Constitution Foundation, Queen’s Prison Law Clinic, John Howard Society of Canada, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, West Coast Prison Justice Society and Speaker of the House of Commons Interveners Coram: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O’Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. Joint Reasons for Judgment: (paras. 1 to 119) Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis J. (Martin, O’Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. concurring) Reasons Dissenting in Part: (paras. 120 to 253) Jamal J. (Kasirer J. concurring) Dissenting Reasons: (paras. 254 to 383) Rowe J. (Côté J. concurring) Note: This document is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in the Canada Supreme Court Reports. Attorney General of Canada Appellant v. Joseph Power Respondent and Attorney General of Ontario, Attorney General of Quebec, Attorney General of Nova Scotia, Attorney General of New Brunswick, Attorney General of Manitoba, Attorney General of British Columbia, Attorney General of Prince Edward Island, Attorney General of Saskatchewan, Attorney General of Alberta, Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador, Fisher River Cree Nation, Sioux Valley Dakota Nation, Manto Sipi Cree Nation, Lake Manitoba First Nation, Quebec Native Women Inc., Speaker of the Senate, David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights, Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Canadian Constitution Foundation, Queen’s Prison Law Clinic, John Howard Society of Canada, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, West Coast Prison Justice Society and Speaker of the House of Commons Interveners Indexed as: Canada (Attorney General) v. Power 2024 SCC 26 File No.: 40241. 2023: December 7; 2024: July 19. Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O’Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for new brunswick msdogfood@hotmail.com |
Tuesday, October 1, 2024
Controversial law designed to free up hospital beds to be tested in Ontario court.
Controversial law designed to free up hospital beds to be tested in Ontario court
A new charter challenge set to get underway on Monday will test the constitutionality of a controversial Ontario law that allows hospitals to place discharged patients into long-term-care homes not of their choosing or face a $400-per-day charge if they refuse.
The Advocacy Centre for the Elderly and the Ontario Health Coalition argues the law, known as the More Bed Better Care Act, or Bill 7, violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The province disagrees.
Tuesday, September 24, 2024
Controversial law designed to free up Ontario hospital beds to be tested...
Sep 23, 2024A new charter challenge will test the constitutionality of a controversial law that allows hospitals to place patients into long-term care homes that are not of their choosing. CBC's Clara Pasieka explains. Read more: https://www.cbc.ca/1.7331047 »»» Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: http://bit.ly/1RreYWS Connect with CBC News Online: For breaking news, video, audio and in-depth coverage: http://bit.ly/1Z0m6iX Follow CBC News on TikTok: https://bit.ly/3TnHioe Follow CBC News on Twitter: http://bit.ly/1sA5P9H Find CBC News on Facebook: http://bit.ly/1WjG36m Follow CBC News on Instagram: http://bit.ly/1Z0iE7O Subscribe to CBC News on Snapchat: https://bit.ly/3leaWsr Download the CBC News app for iOS: http://apple.co/25mpsUz Download the CBC News app for Android: http://bit.ly/1XxuozZ »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» For more than 80 years, CBC News has been the source Canadians turn to, to keep them informed about their communities, their country and their world. Through regional and national programming on multiple platforms, including CBC Television, CBC News Network, CBC Radio, CBCNews.ca, mobile and on-demand, CBC News and its internationally recognized team of award-winning journalists deliver the breaking stories, the issues, the analyses and the personalities that matter to Canadians.
msdogfood@hotmail.com
Saturday, August 31, 2024
Federal court orders hearing into public servants' return-to-office mand...
Aug 30, 2024A Federal Court judge has ordered a full hearing be held in the Public Service Alliance of Canada's challenge to the federal government's return-to-office directive. Privy Council deputy clerk Christiane Fox says the government wants to 'maximize teamwork.' Alex Silas, national executive vice-president of PSAC, responds. »»» Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: http://bit.ly/1RreYWS Connect with CBC News Online: For breaking news, video, audio and in-depth coverage: http://bit.ly/1Z0m6iX Follow CBC News on TikTok: https://bit.ly/3TnHioe Follow CBC News on Twitter: http://bit.ly/1sA5P9H Find CBC News on Facebook: http://bit.ly/1WjG36m Follow CBC News on Instagram: http://bit.ly/1Z0iE7O Subscribe to CBC News on Snapchat: https://bit.ly/3leaWsr Download the CBC News app for iOS: http://apple.co/25mpsUz Download the CBC News app for Android: http://bit.ly/1XxuozZ »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» For more than 80 years, CBC News has been the source Canadians turn to, to keep them informed about their communities, their country and their world. Through regional and national programming on multiple platforms, including CBC Television, CBC News Network, CBC Radio, CBCNews.ca, mobile and on-demand, CBC News and its internationally recognized team of award-winning journalists deliver the breaking stories, the issues, the analyses and the personalities that matter to Canadians.
Tuesday, August 20, 2024
Friday, August 9, 2024
Russian hackers are targeting Canada's food supply
Aug 9, 2024 #News #Canada #Technology
A string of ransomware attacks by Russian hackers targeting Canada's agriculture sector is raising serious concerns about the safety of the food supply.
#News #Canada #Technology
Subscribe to The National:
More from CBC News https://www.cbc.ca/news
The National is the flagship of CBC News, showcasing award-winning journalism from across Canada and around the world. Led by Chief Correspondent Adrienne Arsenault and Ian Hanomansing, our team of trusted reporters helps you make sense of the world, wherever you are.
Transcript
Friday, July 26, 2024
Thursday, July 4, 2024
Chat GBT prompt Please summarize the last 3 weeks of the Supreme court of the United States decisions july 2024
https://chatgpt.com/c/c24f9fee-e9b6-4a88-b021-7ca4cc6a1dd8
Please summarize the last 3 weeks of the Supreme court of the United States decisions
ChatGPT
Searched 4 sites
“Supreme Court of the United States decisions last 3 weeks”
bing.com
Supreme Court of the United States — Opinions - Supreme Court of the United States
supremecourt.gov
Supreme Court of the United States — Opinions of the Court - 2023
supremecourt.gov
SCOTUSblog — SCOTUSblog - Independent News & Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court
scotusblog.com
Over the past three weeks, the Supreme Court of the United States has issued several significant decisions:
Trump v. United States: The Court granted former President Donald Trump immunity from civil liability for actions taken while in office. This decision has significant implications for the legal accountability of sitting and former presidents (Supreme Court of the United States) (SCOTUSblog).
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson: The Court ruled that local laws criminalizing homelessness are unconstitutional, emphasizing that municipalities cannot punish individuals for sleeping outdoors when no shelter is available (Supreme Court of the United States).
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo: The decision in this case limited the regulatory powers of federal agencies, ruling that such agencies cannot impose significant regulations without clear congressional authorization (Supreme Court of the United States).
Fischer v. United States: The Court upheld a conviction for insider trading, reinforcing stringent standards against financial misconduct (Supreme Court of the United States).
Moyle v. United States: In a per curiam decision, the Court resolved a procedural dispute, clarifying the standards for appellate review (Supreme Court of the United States).
Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency: This decision dealt with state versus federal regulatory authority, with the Court siding with Ohio in limiting the EPA's regulatory reach (Supreme Court of the United States).
Social Media Moderation Cases: The Court sent back to lower courts the cases concerning state laws in Texas and Florida regulating social media companies, indicating that the initial rulings did not adequately address broader constitutional questions (SCOTUSblog).
These rulings reflect the Court's current stance on issues ranging from presidential immunity to regulatory authority and individual rights. For more detailed information, you can visit the Supreme Court's official website and SCOTUSblog (Supreme Court of the United States) (SCOTUSblog).
Thank you
ChatGPT
Memory updated
You're welcome! If you need any more information or assistance, feel free to ask.
msdogfood@hotmail.com
Friday, June 21, 2024
Thursday, June 20, 2024
Friday, June 14, 2024
Thursday, June 13, 2024
Saturday, June 8, 2024
The Common Sense Revolution (CSR) & The 1997 Ontario teachers' strike was a strike action
The Common Sense Revolution (CSR) was a political slogan and platform used by Ontario Premier Mike Harris and the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario from 1995 to 2002. The platform focused on reducing taxes, balancing the budget, and reducing the size and role of government, with an emphasis on individual economic responsibility. The CSR was inspired by neoliberal policies and was characterized by a reduction in government spending, tax cuts, and welfare reforms. The CSR was implemented through various policies, including the reduction of personal income tax rates by 30%, balancing the provincial budget, and reducing the number of people on social assistance. The platform also included the amalgamation of municipalities, which led to the creation of the "megacity" of Toronto and other larger municipalities. The CSR had a significant impact on Ontario's economy and politics, with both positive and negative consequences. Supporters argue that it helped to stimulate economic growth and reduce the deficit, while critics argue that it led to a decline in public services, increased poverty and inequality, and a shift in wealth from urban to suburban areas. Overall, the Common Sense Revolution represented a significant shift in Ontario's political and economic landscape, with lasting impacts on the province's governance, economy, and society. Written by Meta AI
The 1997 Ontario teachers' strike was a strike action taken by teachers in Ontario, Canada, in response to the introduction of Bill 160, the Education Quality Improvement Act. Here are some key points about the strike and Bill 160:
- Bill 160 was introduced by the Ontario government in September 1997 and aimed to improve education quality and accountability.
- The bill proposed changes to teacher hiring and evaluation practices, increased school board autonomy, and allowed for non-certified instructors to teach certain subjects.
- Teachers' unions opposed the bill, citing concerns about teacher professionalism, accountability, and the potential for unqualified instructors to replace certified teachers.
- On October 27, 1997, Ontario teachers went on strike, with over 100,000 teachers participating.
- The strike lasted for one day, with teachers returning to work after the government agreed to consider their concerns and amend the bill.
- The government eventually withdrew some of the controversial clauses from the bill, including those related to non-certified instructors.
- The strike and Bill 160 were significant events in Ontario's education history, highlighting tensions between teachers, governments, and school boards over issues like teacher autonomy, accountability, and education quality.
Friday, June 7, 2024
Thursday, June 6, 2024
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)