Showing posts with label Me. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Me. Show all posts

Thursday, November 7, 2024

Trump Wins - Again.







No encore edition this Wednesday, instead this is the real deal. Donald Trump is heading back to the White House after a huge win last night over Kamala Harris. What happened? What does it mean? And what happens next? Keith Boag and Bruce Anderson join us for a roundtable on the comeback of the ages. Sign up to the Buzz Newsletter: https://nationalnewswatch.com/thebuzz https://www.siriusxm.ca/TheBridgeCA











msdogfood@hotmail.com

Tuesday, September 24, 2024

Controversial law designed to free up Ontario hospital beds to be tested...






Sep 23, 2024A new charter challenge will test the constitutionality of a controversial law that allows hospitals to place patients into long-term care homes that are not of their choosing. CBC's Clara Pasieka explains. Read more: https://www.cbc.ca/1.7331047 »»» Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: http://bit.ly/1RreYWS Connect with CBC News Online: For breaking news, video, audio and in-depth coverage: http://bit.ly/1Z0m6iX Follow CBC News on TikTok: https://bit.ly/3TnHioe Follow CBC News on Twitter: http://bit.ly/1sA5P9H Find CBC News on Facebook: http://bit.ly/1WjG36m Follow CBC News on Instagram: http://bit.ly/1Z0iE7O Subscribe to CBC News on Snapchat: https://bit.ly/3leaWsr Download the CBC News app for iOS: http://apple.co/25mpsUz Download the CBC News app for Android: http://bit.ly/1XxuozZ »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» For more than 80 years, CBC News has been the source Canadians turn to, to keep them informed about their communities, their country and their world. Through regional and national programming on multiple platforms, including CBC Television, CBC News Network, CBC Radio, CBCNews.ca, mobile and on-demand, CBC News and its internationally recognized team of award-winning journalists deliver the breaking stories, the issues, the analyses and the personalities that matter to Canadians.





msdogfood@hotmail.com

Legal challenge begins on Ontario's controversial Bill 7






Thursday, July 4, 2024

Chat GBT prompt Please summarize the last 3 weeks of the Supreme court of the United States decisions july 2024



https://chatgpt.com/c/c24f9fee-e9b6-4a88-b021-7ca4cc6a1dd8







Please summarize the last 3 weeks of the Supreme court of the United States decisions

ChatGPT




Searched 4 sites




“Supreme Court of the United States decisions last 3 weeks”

bing.com




Supreme Court of the United States — Opinions - Supreme Court of the United States

supremecourt.gov




Supreme Court of the United States — Opinions of the Court - 2023

supremecourt.gov




SCOTUSblog — SCOTUSblog - Independent News & Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court

scotusblog.com







Over the past three weeks, the Supreme Court of the United States has issued several significant decisions:




Trump v. United States: The Court granted former President Donald Trump immunity from civil liability for actions taken while in office. This decision has significant implications for the legal accountability of sitting and former presidents​ (Supreme Court of the United States)​​ (SCOTUSblog)​.




City of Grants Pass v. Johnson: The Court ruled that local laws criminalizing homelessness are unconstitutional, emphasizing that municipalities cannot punish individuals for sleeping outdoors when no shelter is available​ (Supreme Court of the United States)​.




Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo: The decision in this case limited the regulatory powers of federal agencies, ruling that such agencies cannot impose significant regulations without clear congressional authorization​ (Supreme Court of the United States)​.




Fischer v. United States: The Court upheld a conviction for insider trading, reinforcing stringent standards against financial misconduct​ (Supreme Court of the United States)​.




Moyle v. United States: In a per curiam decision, the Court resolved a procedural dispute, clarifying the standards for appellate review​ (Supreme Court of the United States)​.




Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency: This decision dealt with state versus federal regulatory authority, with the Court siding with Ohio in limiting the EPA's regulatory reach​ (Supreme Court of the United States)​.




Social Media Moderation Cases: The Court sent back to lower courts the cases concerning state laws in Texas and Florida regulating social media companies, indicating that the initial rulings did not adequately address broader constitutional questions​ (SCOTUSblog)​.




These rulings reflect the Court's current stance on issues ranging from presidential immunity to regulatory authority and individual rights. For more detailed information, you can visit the Supreme Court's official website and SCOTUSblog​ (Supreme Court of the United States)​​ (SCOTUSblog)​.


Thank you

ChatGPT

Memory updated

You're welcome! If you need any more information or assistance, feel free to ask.




msdogfood@hotmail.com






Saturday, June 8, 2024

The Common Sense Revolution (CSR) & The 1997 Ontario teachers' strike was a strike action




The Common Sense Revolution (CSR) was a political slogan and platform used by Ontario Premier Mike Harris and the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario from 1995 to 2002. The platform focused on reducing taxes, balancing the budget, and reducing the size and role of government, with an emphasis on individual economic responsibility. The CSR was inspired by neoliberal policies and was characterized by a reduction in government spending, tax cuts, and welfare reforms. The CSR was implemented through various policies, including the reduction of personal income tax rates by 30%, balancing the provincial budget, and reducing the number of people on social assistance. The platform also included the amalgamation of municipalities, which led to the creation of the "megacity" of Toronto and other larger municipalities. The CSR had a significant impact on Ontario's economy and politics, with both positive and negative consequences. Supporters argue that it helped to stimulate economic growth and reduce the deficit, while critics argue that it led to a decline in public services, increased poverty and inequality, and a shift in wealth from urban to suburban areas. Overall, the Common Sense Revolution represented a significant shift in Ontario's political and economic landscape, with lasting impacts on the province's governance, economy, and society. Written by Meta AI



The 1997 Ontario teachers' strike was a strike action taken by teachers in Ontario, Canada, in response to the introduction of Bill 160, the Education Quality Improvement Act. Here are some key points about the strike and Bill 160:


- Bill 160 was introduced by the Ontario government in September 1997 and aimed to improve education quality and accountability.


- The bill proposed changes to teacher hiring and evaluation practices, increased school board autonomy, and allowed for non-certified instructors to teach certain subjects.


- Teachers' unions opposed the bill, citing concerns about teacher professionalism, accountability, and the potential for unqualified instructors to replace certified teachers.


- On October 27, 1997, Ontario teachers went on strike, with over 100,000 teachers participating.


- The strike lasted for one day, with teachers returning to work after the government agreed to consider their concerns and amend the bill.


- The government eventually withdrew some of the controversial clauses from the bill, including those related to non-certified instructors.


- The strike and Bill 160 were significant events in Ontario's education history, highlighting tensions between teachers, governments, and school boards over issues like teacher autonomy, accountability, and education quality.


Summary by Meta AI




msdogfood@hotmail.com




Monday, January 8, 2024

The Mystery of CVE-2023-38606 - SpinRite Update, Nebula Mesh, Apple's Ba...



Jan 2, 2024  Security Now
• SpinRite 6.1 update
• Pruning Root Certificates
• A solution to Schrodinger's Bowl
• DNS Benchmark and anti-virus tools
• Nebula Mesh
• SpinRite 7 is coming
• The Mystery of CVE-2023-38606


Hosts: Steve Gibson and Leo Laporte
Security Now episode 955
More Info: https://twit.tv/shows/security-now/ep...

Sponsors:
• bitwarden.com/twit
• kolide.com/securitynow
• Melissa.com/twit
• drata.com/twit

Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/security-now

Get episodes ad-free with Club TWiT at https://twit.tv/clubtwit

You can submit a question to Security Now at the GRC Feedback Page.

For 16kbps versions, transcripts, and notes (including fixes), visit Steve's site: https://grc.com/ also the home of the best disk maintenance and recovery utility ever written Spinrite 6.

Products we recommend: https://www.amazon.com/shop/twitnetca...
TWiT may earn commissions on certain products.

Follow us:
https://twit.tv/
 

 / twit  
 

 / twitnetwork  
 

 / twit.tv  

About us:
TWiT.tv is a technology podcasting network located in the San Francisco Bay Area with the #1 ranked technology podcast This Week in Tech hosted by Leo Laporte. Every week we produce dozens of hours of content on a variety of programs including Tech News Weekly, MacBreak Weekly, This Week in Google, Windows Weekly, Security Now, and more.
Explore the podcast

564 episodes







Friday, November 10, 2023

Netherlands: Constitution Amended to Explicitly Prohibit Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation or Disability library of Congress legal monitor


Netherlands: Constitution Amended to Explicitly Prohibit Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation or Disability






On January 17, 2023, the Dutch Senate (Eerste Kamer), the upper house of the Dutch parliament, approved in a second reading an amendment to the constitutional principle of nondiscrimination to include sexual orientation and disability. The amendment was approved in a roll-call vote with 56 members of parliament (MPs) voting in favor and 15 MPs voting against. The House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) had adopted the proposal on March 15, 2022. The amendment will enter into force immediately after publication in the Dutch gazette (Staatsblad). (Grondwet (Dutch Constitution) art. 139.)

Previously, the principle of nondiscrimination, which is codified in article 1 of the Constitution, explicitly prohibited only discrimination based on “religion, belief, political opinion, race, or sex or on any other grounds whatsoever.”

Furthermore, the Dutch Senate approved an additional motion requiring the government to submit to the State Commission on Discrimination and Racism (Staatscommissie discriminatie en racism) a proposal to rearrange the wording of article 1 of the Constitution so that the general prohibition (“discrimination on any grounds whatsoever”) is placed before the specific nondiscrimination grounds.

Background on the Constitutional Amendment Procedure

An amendment of the Constitution requires two readings of the proposed amendment in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The first reading follows the standard legislative procedure, meaning a simple majority is required to adopt the proposal. A second reading in the House of Representative may take place only after parliamentary elections, so that voters may have an input. (Grondwet art. 137, para. 3.) At the second reading, a two-thirds majority of both houses is required to pass the bill. (Art. 137, para. 4.)

Jenny Gesley, Law Library of Congress
February 10, 2023

Read more Global Legal Monitor articles.