Saturday, July 13, 2013

Kumho Asiana Group



Kumho Asiana Group is a large South Korean Chaebol (conglomerate), with subsidiaries in the automotive, industry, leisure, logistic, chemical and airline fields. The group is headquartered at the Kumho Asiana Main Tower in Sinmunno 1-ga, Jongno-gu, Seoul, South Korea.[1] The group was established in 1946.[citation needed] As of 2008 the "Kumho Asiana Group" CEO is Bak Sam Koo.


Contents
1 Subsidiaries
2 See also
3 References
4 External links

Subsidiaries
Air Busan
Asiana AAS Airport Services
Asiana Abacus
Asiana Airlines
Asiana IDT
Asiana Leisure
Incheon Airport Energy
Kumho Art Museum
Kumho Arthall
Kumho Asiana Cultural Foundation
Kumho Engineering and Construction
Kumho Express - Sold to KoFC IBK Kaystone PEF
Kumho Hertz Rent A Car (Kumho Rent A Car) - Sold to KT (Korea Telecom)
Kumho Investment Bank - Sold to Woori Financial Group
Kumho KIFT - Sold to CJ (Cheil Jedang)
Kumho Life Insurance - Sold to Korea Development Bank
Kumho Mitsui Chemical -
Kumho P&B Chemical
Kumho Petrochemical
Kumho Polychem
Kumho Resort Sold to CJ (Cheil Jedang)
Kumho Tires
Kumho Trading Corporation
Korea Express (Daehan Logistics) - Sold to CJ (Cheil Jedang)
Seoul Express Bus Terminal - Sold to Shinsegye Group
Songnisan Express
See also
Economy of South Korea
Chaebol
List of South Korean companies
References

^ "Contact Us." Kumho Asiana Group. Retrieved on November 26, 2008.
External links
South Korea portal
Companies portal
Main
Kumho Asiana Group Homepage (in Korean, English, and Chinese)Group
Kumho Tires
Asiana Airlines
Kumho Express
Asiana AAS Airport Services
Asiana Abacus
Kumho Petrochemical
Kumho P&B Chemical
Kumho Polychem
Kumho Mitsui Chemical
Kumho Constructions
Kumho Daewoo E&C
Kumho Rent A Car
Kumho Resort
Asiana Leisure
Kumho KIFT
Kumho Life
Kumho Investment Bank
Asiana IDT
Incheon Airport Energy
Kumho Trading Corporation
Kumho Asiana Cultural Foundation
Kumho Arthall
Kumho Art Museum

Thursday, July 11, 2013

San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) : Asiana Airlines Flight 214



San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) is the main public hospital in San Francisco, California, and the only Level I Trauma Center for 1.5 million residents of San Francisco and northern San Mateo County.[1] As the City and County of San Francisco’s acute care hospital, SFGH is the primary provider of safety-net health care for the most vulnerable – the poor, uninsured working families, immigrants and the elderly. About 80 percent of its patient population either receives publicly funded health insurance (Medicare or Medi-Cal) or is uninsured. SFGH also cares for the homeless, who make up about 8 percent of its patients.[2] It is the largest acute inpatient and rehabilitation hospital for psychiatric patients in the City. Additionally, it is the only acute hospital in San Francisco that provides twenty-four hour psychiatric emergency services and operates the only Trauma Center (Level 1) in San Francisco.


In addition to the approximately 3,500 San Francisco municipal employees, the University of California at San Franciscoprovides approximately 1,500 employees (including Physicians, nurses and ancillary personnel). The hospital, especially its Ward 86,[3] was instrumental in treating and identifying early cases of AIDS. The original brick main building was replaced with aconcrete one with construction started in 1971;[4] four remaining 1915 five-story edifices are among the tallest brick buildings in the city. The hospital is located at 1001 Potrero Avenue between the Mission District and Potrero Hill; U.S. Route 101 rounds its east side at “Hospital Curve.”


A new San Francisco General Hospital acute care building is currently under construction on the site and is planned to be opened in 2015. It will be the only hospital in San Francisco built with a base-isolated foundation, the latest technology for protecting buildings during seismic activity. Notable improvements include expanding the capacity of emergency department and increasing the number of beds as well as increasing the number of intensive care unit (ICU) beds and combining the previously separate surgical and medical units into one ICU.
Timeline
1850 San Francisco Granted a city Charter and creates a Board of Health; cholera strikes, temporary hospital set up.
1857 City and County opens it first permanent hospital in the former North Beach schoolhouse at Stockton and Francisco streets.
1864 "In the fall of 1864, Dr. Hugh Toland opened his new medical school, which in 1872 would become the University of California. The Medical School building was located on Stockton Street near Chestnut adjacent to the City and County Hospital...In 1865, Toland was granted permission to use the hospital for clinical instruction." (pg37[6]))
1872 "On August 28, 1872, the New City-County Hospital on Potrero Street was opened...it was described as a two-story, wooden frame building with a brick foundation..."(pg43[7]))
1873 Agreement allows City and County Hospital to serve as UC and Stanford medical schools' clinical facility.
1906 "The Earthquake and Great Fire devastate the City in April 18, 1906... the Hospital with its wood frame structure anchored on the firm rock of Potrero Hill survived more or less intact, with minimal injury to inmates or staff." (pg60[8])
1907 Long needed children's ward and contagious pavilion open.
1908 Second plague epidemic strikes; hospital pronounced unfit for patient care when plague infested rats and flees are found there; wooden buildings burned to the ground by city order and patients moved to the old Jockey Club Racetrack in the Ingleside district, where box stalls and grandstands are converted into a temporary hospital; "Mission Emergency" Hospital, one of the city owned network, operates out of a shack on the Potrero Ave site.
1915 New San Francisco General Hospital, landscaped, red brick, Italian Renaissance style complex, dedicated during the City's celebration of the completion of the Panama Canal; motorized ambulances replace the horse-drawn vans.
1924 Psychiatric ward opens to treat acutely ill patients and reduce state hospital admissions.
1959 "In May 1959 in the first contract with the University of California was signed and amounted to 1% of the total hospital budget or $154,000...the value of teaching programs to a public hospital was emphasized by the university in their negotiations with the city..." (pg90[9])
1963 "...a modern medical library funded primarily by UC was opened on Ward 31. It was named the Briggs-Barnett library after two former chiefs of medicine on the UC and Stanford service." (pg93[10])
1965 "The pressing need for more psychiatric beds, the general overcrowding, and the problems of maintenance and staffing all combined to emphasize the inadequacy of the 50-year-old hospital...a $33.7 million bond issue...passed overwhelmingly with the highest support of any bond since the since the earthquake of 1906." (pg93[11])
1971 Groundbreaking for the new hospital.
1972 Trauma Center opens at Mission Emergency, with a grant from NIH.
1973 Outpatient department, Stroke Research Center, coronary and respiratory ICUs, Family Practice residency starts.
1976 New SFGH Medical Center opens after three years of planning by community advisory boards.
1979 Specially equipped Burn Unit, San Francisco's second, becomes part of the Trauma Center; Gladstone Foundation Cardiovascular Laboratories open.
1980 Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center established to study basic neuroscience and the effects of alcohol on the brain.
1983 UCSF clinicians and researchers develop the country's first outpatient AIDS clinic and inpatient ward at SFGH and mount an enormous multidisciplinary effort to fight off the disease.
1991 Trauma Center designated the only Level I Trauma Center in San Francisco providing around the clock medical and psychiatric emergency services.
1993 SFGH continues to be recognized as the premier hospital for AIDS care in the United States. The Gladstone Institute of Virology and Immunology opens at SFGH, second largest basic research institute in the US. In partnership with UCSF, conducts research on new drugs and treatment for HIV/AIDS, along with clinical trials, prevention, outreach, and professional education programs.
2004 Avon Foundation Comprehensive Breast Center open to provide state-of-the-art imaging for breast cancer detection, more than doubling screening capacity and expanding outreach at SFGH.
2008 San Francisco passes a $888 million bond to build a new hospital at SFGH between the historic 1915 red brick buildings. The bond received 84% approval.
2015 The new hospital is slated to be complete.[12]
Frida Kahlo, Diego Rivera & SFGH


San Francisco General Hospital Medical Center is proud to house paintings by two famous artists, Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo. Rivera’s “La Tortillera,” painted in 1926, and Kahlo’s 1931 “Portrait of Dr. Leo Eloesser,” were both given to the University of California San Francisco for display at the SFGH.


The paintings were donated to UCSF with the stipulation that they be hung at the San Francisco General Hospital where their original owner, the late thoracic surgeon Leo Eloesser, MD, served for 36 years.
Dr. Leo Eloesser[


Born in San Francisco, Leo Eloesser (1881-1976) was a pioneering thoracic surgeon and innovator in the provision of rural and wartime health care.


After receiving his Medical Doctorate from the University of Heidelberg in 1907, Dr. Eloesser returned to San Francisco in 1910, did a clinical internship at SFGH, and joined the faculty of the Stanford Medical School in 1912, where he eventually became the Chief of the Thoracic Service of the Stanford University Division at San Francisco City and County Hospital.


After World War One (in 1918-19), Dr. Eloesser served as Chief of Amputation and Orthopaedic Services at Letterman Hospital in San Francisco. He was known for his work among the poor and indigent, and, in 1935-36, he established the first Thoracic Surgery clinic in Russia. At the age of 56, working as a medic in the Spanish Civil War, he ran his own Mobile Surgical Hospital.


Following his retirement in 1945, Dr. Eloesser worked for the United Nations Rehabilitation and Relief Administration (UNRRA) and UNICEF, in various capacities related to the development of rural health care in China, including a term as director of the Bethune International Peace Hospital and Medical School in Hsi Ching (Yenan Province).


During his last years, in Tacamburo, Michoacan, Mexico, he continued his efforts to develop solutions to rural medical problems by using indigenous resources to combat the high incidence of tuberculosis and infant death, including support of teaching and surgical activities at the Sanitario de Huipulco, al Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, and the establishment of a curriculum to train rural midwives.
Dr. Eloesser and the Riveras


Dr. Eloesser first met Diego Rivera in 1926 and later came to know Frida Kahlo, who looked to him for medical advice and friendship for the rest of her life. Both Rivera and Kahlo lived and worked in San Francisco in 1930-31, and during their stay, Dr. Eloesser treated her for chronic medical problems she suffered as a result of an earlier bus accident that occurred in Mexico when she was a young woman.


As a token of their friendship, and to repay him for his service, Kahlo painted a portrait of Dr. Eloesser in 1931 at his home on Leavenworth Street. Executed in oil on masonite, it shows him standing beside a model sailing ship named “Los Tres Amigos.” A small Rivera drawing hangs in the background. Rivera later gave Dr. Eloesser, “La Tortillera,” an oil on canvas depicting a woman making tortillas. The three remained close friends in the years that followed. Kahlo wrote regularly to Dr. Eloesser, requesting his advice in letters addressed to her dear “doctorcito.”


Some years later, Dr. Eloesser presented Kahlo's portrait to a good friend, Carlton Mathewson, MD, UCSF clinical professor emeritus of surgery, who in 1968 donated it to UCSF with the provision that it permanently remain hanging at SFGH. In 1975 Dr. Eloesser gave “La Tortillera” to the University with the same stipulation.
Touring


The paintings often go on tour. The portrait of Dr. Eloesser has been to Mexico, Europe and across the US in recent years with celebrations for the 100th anniversary of Frida Kahlo's birth. During construction on the new hospital at SFGH both paintings are hanging at the SFMOMA.
References
^ http://www.sfdph.org/dph/comupg/oservices/medSvs/SFGH/default.asp
^ http://medschool2.ucsf.edu/sfgh/social-responsibility
^ http://hiv.ucsf.edu/
^ "Catastrophes, Epidemics, and Neglected Diseases: San Francisco General Hospital and the Evolution of Public Care" by William Blaisdell, MD and Moses Grossman, MD
^ http://medschool2.ucsf.edu/sfgh/historic-partnership
^ "Catastrophes, Epidemics, and Neglected Diseases: San Francisco General Hospital and the Evolution of Public Care" by William Blaisdell, MD and Moses Grossman, MD
^ "Catastrophes, Epidemics, and Neglected Diseases: San Francisco General Hospital and the Evolution of Public Care" by William Blaisdell, MD and Moses Grossman, MD
^ "Catastrophes, Epidemics, and Neglected Diseases: San Francisco General Hospital and the Evolution of Public Care" by William Blaisdell, MD and Moses Grossman, MD
^ "Catastrophes, Epidemics, and Neglected Diseases: San Francisco General Hospital and the Evolution of Public Care" by William Blaisdell, MD and Moses Grossman, MD
^ "Catastrophes, Epidemics, and Neglected Diseases: San Francisco General Hospital and the Evolution of Public Care" by William Blaisdell, MD and Moses Grossman, MD
^ "Catastrophes, Epidemics, and Neglected Diseases: San Francisco General Hospital and the Evolution of Public Care" by William Blaisdell, MD and Moses Grossman, MD
^ http://www.sfdph.org/dph/rebuildSFGH/
^ http://medschool2.ucsf.edu/sfgh/frida-kahlo-diego-rivera-sfgh
External links
SFGH site at SF Dep't of Public Health
UCSF SFGH site
SFGH campus maps
Center for Vulnerable Populations
This hospital in the CA Healthcare Atlas A project by OSHPD
Brain and Spinal Injury Center
Orthopaedic Trauma Institute

Vic Toews Relents and Resigns | Weekly News Update from OpenMedia ca -

Monday, July 8, 2013

San Francisco International Airport : Asiana Airlines Flight 214, •On July 6, 2013

Accidents and incidents

A
  • On October 29, 1953, British Commonwealth Pacific Airlines flight 304, a Douglas DC-6 en route from Sydney, Australia with fuel stops in Auckland, New Zealand, Fiji, and Honolulu crashed on approach to SFO into Kings Mountain in San Mateo County. All 19 passengers and crew died.
  • On December 24, 1964, Flying Tiger Line Flight 282, a Lockheed Constellation cargo aircraft departing for New York City, crashed in the hills west of the airport, killing all three crewmembers on board.[80]
  • On November 22, 1968, a Japan Air Lines DC-8, named the Shiga,[citation needed] operating Flight 2, crash landed on final approach at 9:30 a.m. on a shallow submerged reef at the eastern tip of Coyote Point (three miles short of the runway southeast of the airport). The plane was on a trip from Tokyo to SFO, after making a stop in Honolulu. The pilot was experienced, but apparently misread the instruments on the DC-8, which was less than a year old. There were 107 people on the plane. There were no deaths or serious injuries. The plane was salvaged by Bigge Drayage Company soon after the crash. All luggage and fuel were removed to cut the weight and the plane was lifted onto a barge and taken to the airport for repairs. The cost of repairs was $4 million and the plane re-entered service the following April.
  • On July 30, 1971, Pan Am Flight 845, a Boeing 747 (registration: N747PA, name: Clipper America), struck navigational aids at the end of runway 1R on takeoff for Tokyo. The aircraft's landing gear and other systems were damaged. Two passengers were seriously injured by metal components of the runway approach light pier entering the cabin. The flight proceeded out over the Pacific Ocean to dump fuel in order to reduce weight for an emergency landing. Emergency services were deployed at the airport, and the plane returned and landed on runway 28R. During landing the aircraft veered off the runway. There was no fire. After coming to a stop, the aircraft slowly tilted aft, coming to rest on its tail in a nose-high attitude. The forward evacuation slides were therefore in a nearly vertical position. Evacuation using these slides caused all of the additional injuries, some severe. There were no fatalities among the 218 passengers and crew aboard. An investigation determined the cause of the accident to be erroneous information from the flight dispatcher to the crew regarding weight and runway length.[81]
  • On June 28, 2008, an ABX Air Boeing 767 preparing to depart with cargo caught fire and was seriously damaged. The pilots escaped uninjured. The airline had received a threat the week before, but thus far investigations have revealed no evidence of any malicious device on board.[82][dated info]
  • On July 6, 2013, Asiana Airlines Flight 214, a 777-200ER registered HL7742, crashed while landing at San Francisco International Airport. After slamming into the seawall of the runway, it touched down short of the runway. Passengers and crew evacuated before fire destroyed the aircraft. Two fatalities resulted and ten were in critical condition, according to local media. An NTSB investigation is underway.[83][84][85]

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Asiana Airlines Flight 214 July 6, 2013

Asiana Airlines Flight 214

   
Asiana Airlines Flight 214

HL7742, the aircraft involved in the incident, about to land at Hong Kong International Airport in July 2011
Accident summary
DateJuly 6, 2013
SiteSan Francisco International Airport
37°36′48″N 122°21′53″W / 37.61333°N 122.36472°W / 37.61333; -122.36472Coordinates: 37°36′48″N 122°21′53″W / 37.61333°N 122.36472°W / 37.61333; -122.36472
Passengers291[1]
Crew16[1]
Injuries (non-fatal)182, at least 5 critical[2]
Fatalities2[3][4]
Survivors305
Aircraft typeBoeing 777-200ER
OperatorAsiana Airlines
RegistrationHL7742
Flight originIncheon International Airport
DestinationSan Francisco International Airport
Asiana Airlines Flight 214 was a scheduled transpacific passenger flight from Incheon International Airport, South Korea, to San Francisco International Airport, United States. On July 6, 2013, the Asiana Airlines Boeing 777-200ER operating the flight crash-landed at San Francisco International Airport, killing two and injuring 182 of the 307 (291 passengers and 16 crew) aboard. It was the first fatal crash involving the 777 after over 18 years of service.[1][5]

Contents

 [hide

Crash

Location of the remainder of the fuselage
Red pog.svg
Location of the remainder of the fuselage
On July 6, 2013, at 11:26 PDT (18:26 UTC), a Boeing 777-200ER, registration number HL7742,[6] crashed at San Francisco International Airport (SFO) upon landing, short of runway 28L's threshold, striking the seawall that projects into San Francisco Bay.[7][8][9] Both engines and the tail section behind the aft pressure bulkhead became separated from the aircraft.[10] The vertical and both horizontal stabilizers came to rest on the runway before the threshold, while the remainder of the fuselage and wings halted to the left side of the runway about 2,000 feet (610 m) from the seawall.[11] Eyewitnesses described a large brief fireball upon the aircraft landing, and a second large explosion minutes after the impact, with a large, dark plume of smoke rising from the fuselage. Evacuation slides were deployed on one side of the plane, and were used to evacuate the aircraft,[10][12] and, despite damage, "many [...] were able to walk away on their own".[13]
The Instrument Landing System (ILS) and consequently the navigational glidepath on runway 28L had been out of service since June 11, and at the time of the crash.[14] Arrivals were standard visual arrivals, helped by the clear weather at the time.[15] Aviation safety commentator Chesley Sullenberger said a project to increase the runway safety zone required pilots to temporarily rely on sight instead of electronics with automated warnings. He said this project will be looked at as a possible factor in the crash. As part of the same project the airport planned to add, by 2015, porous concrete to the end of the runway to absorb the impact of an airplane.[16]
This was the third fatal crash in Asiana's 25-year history.[17] It was the first fatal crash of a Boeing 777. It was also the first fatal passenger airliner crash in the United States since the Colgan Air Flight 3407 crash in 2009.[18]
This was the third hull loss of a Boeing 777 and the second involving a short landing at the end of a long-haul flight. The Boeing 777-200ER that was involved in the incident was originally delivered to Asiana Airlines in March 2006.[19]

Passengers and crew

The plane had a crew of 16 people and a total of 291 passengers: 141 Chinese, 77 South Korean, 61 American, 3 Indian, 3 Canadian, 1 Vietnamese, 1 French, and 1 Japanese.[20]
At a press conference held at the airport, Chief of the San Francisco Fire Department Joanne Hayes-White confirmed that there were two deaths; both were Chinese passport holders and female teenagers (both 16 years old)[4][21] with both bodies found outside the aircraft.[2] According to a hospital spokesperson, five people were in critical condition.[2] Nine area hospitals accepted a total of 182 injured.[3] During a later airport press conference, airport spokesman Doug Yakel said only one person was unaccounted for,[22] down from 60 reported earlier.[3] During an additional press conference, Hayes-White stated all persons had been accounted for after reconciliation of two intake points at the airport.[23]
Xinhua stated that 70 students and teachers traveling to the United States for a summer camp were among the Chinese passengers. According to Reuters, "local authorities" stated that 30 of the students and teachers were from Shanxi and the others were from Zhejiang.[18] Of the students and teachers, 34 were from Jiangshan High School in Zhejiang, traveling together in one group. The group consisted of 5 teachers and 29 students.[24] The provincial education department of Shanxi said that one teacher received minor injuries. The two deceased passengers, 16-year-old girls, were students at Jiangshan High School. The other Jiangshan students survived the crash.[18]

Aftermath

Smoke rising from the wreckage, as seen from another flight on the taxiway
The cause of the crash remains unknown.[9] This was the first instance of a passenger fatality in the service record of the Boeing 777 series.[25]
The airport was closed for approximately five hours after the crash,[10][12][7] and incoming flights destined for San Francisco were diverted to the other major airports in the San Francisco Bay Area or to Sacramento, Los Angeles, and Seattle.[26] By 3:30 PDT (22:30 UTC), runways 01L/19R and 01R/19L were reopened, with the runway of the accident (10R/28L) and the one in parallel to it (10L/28R) remaining closed.[7]

Investigation

The National Transportation Safety Board has begun an investigation and sent a crew to the scene.[3] Asiana CEO Yoon Young-Doo said, "Currently we understand that there were no engine or mechanical problems." The preliminary indications suggest the plane came in too short and hit the seawall as it attempted to land.[10] On July 7, 2013, NTSB investigators recovered the flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder and transported them to Washington, D.C. for analysis.[27]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c Kim, Jack; Pomeroy, Robin (July 6, 2013). "Asiana plane carried 291 passengers, 16 crew: airline". Reuters. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  2. ^ a b c Botelho, Greg (July 7, 2013). "2 die, 305 survive after airliner crashes, burns at San Francisco airport". CNN. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  3. ^ a b c d Welch, William; Swartz, Jon M.; Strauss, Gary (July 6, 2013). "2 confirmed dead in San Francisco Airport crash". USA Today. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  4. ^ a b "Asiana Crisis Management System". Asiana Airlines. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  5. ^ "Press Release for Incident Involving Asiana Flight OZ 214 - July 7, 2013" (Press release). Asiana Airlines. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  6. ^ "Asiana 777 (AAR214) crashes upon landing at SFO". FlightAware. July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  7. ^ a b c Hradecky, Simon (July 6, 2013). "Accident: Asiana B772 at San Francisco on Jul 6th 2013, touched down short of the runway, broke up and burst into flames". The Aviation Herald. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  8. ^ Arkin, Daniel (July 6, 2013). "Boeing 777 crashes while landing at San Francisco airport". NBC News. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  9. ^ a b Somaiya, Ravi (July 6, 2013). "Plane Crashes on Landing in San Francisco". The New York Times. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  10. ^ a b c d "Boeing 777 plane crash-lands at San Francisco airport". BBC News. July 7, 2013. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  11. ^ "Where Asiana Flight 214 Came to Rest". The New York Times. July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  12. ^ a b Botelho, Greg; Ahlers, Mike M. (July 6, 2013). "Airline's Boeing 777 crash lands at San Francisco International Airport". CNN. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  13. ^ Onishi, Norimitsu; Somaiya, Ravi (July 7, 2013). "Victims of Plane Crash are Identified as Two Chinese Students". The New York Times. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  14. ^ "KSFO San Francisco Intl". PilotWeb. Federal Aviation Administration. Archived from the original on July 7, 2013. Retrieved July 7, 2013. "06/005 SFO navigation instrument landing system Runway 28L glide path out of service with effect from or effective from 1306011400-1308222359" 
  15. ^ "Weather at incident time (METAR)". Navlost.eu. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  16. ^ Hulac, Kari, ed. (July 6, 2013). "Pilot "Sully" Sullenberger: SFO Runway Construction Intended to Prevent Crashes Such as Saturday's". Milbrae Patch (Patch). Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  17. ^ "Asiana jet crash further tarnishes Korean carrier's safety record". Reuters. July 7, 2013. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  18. ^ a b c "Two dead in Asiana plane crash are Chinese citizens, identified as teenage girls". South China Morning Post. Reuters. July 7, 2013. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  19. ^ "HL7742 Asiana Airlines Boeing 777-28E(ER) - cn 29171 / ln 553". Planespotters.net. Retrieved 6 July 2013. 
  20. ^ "Victims of Plane Crash Are Identified as 2 Chinese Students". The New York Times. July 7, 2013. 
  21. ^ "Asiana Airlines Crash: At a glance". CNN. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  22. ^ Collins, Terry (July 6, 2013). "Official: 1 Unaccounted For From S.F. Plane Crash". Associated Press. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  23. ^ "Two dead, dozens injured in Boeing 777 crash". Oakland, CA: KTVU-TV. July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  24. ^ "Asiana crash deaths ID'd as 2 Chinese teens." (Contributing: Sunny Yang; The Associated Press). USA Today. July 7, 2013. Retrieved on July 7, 2013. "Teacher Ye Lianjun told Chinese television that there were 34 people traveling in the Jiangshan Middle School group — five teachers and 29 students."
  25. ^ Axelrod, Jim (July 6, 2013 7:16 PM). "Chesley Sullenberger: San Francisco airport a challenging place to land". CBS News. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  26. ^ "Plane crash at San Francisco airport, 2 dead". CBS News. Associated Press. July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  27. ^ Julie Yoon, F. Brinley Bruton and Matthew DeLuca (July 7, 2013). "NTSB: Officials recover black boxes from San Francisco crash site". NBC News. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 

External links


The Boeing 777 06/07/2013

The Boeing 777 is a long-range wide-body twin-engine jet airliner manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes. It is the world's largest twinjet and has a typical seating capacity for 314 to 451 passengers, with a range of 5,235 to 9,380 nautical miles (9,695 to 17,370 km), depending on the version. Commonly referred to as the "Triple Seven",[3][4] its distinguishing features include the largest-diameter turbofan engines of any aircraft, six wheels on each main landing gear, a circular fuselage cross-section and a blade-shaped tail cone.[5] Developed in consultation with eight major airlines, the 777 was designed to replace older wide-body airliners and bridge the capacity difference between the 767 and 747. As Boeing's first fly-by-wire airliner, it has computer-mediated controls; it is also the first entirely computer-designed commercial aircraft.
The 777 is produced in two fuselage lengths. The original 777-200 variant entered commercial service in 1995, followed by the extended-range 777-200ER in 1997. The stretched 777-300, which is 33.3 ft (10.1 m) longer, entered service in 1998. The longer-range 777-300ER and 777-200LR variants entered service in 2004 and 2006 respectively, while a freighter version, the 777F, debuted in February 2009. Both longer-range versions and the freighter feature General Electric GE90 engines and extended raked wingtips. The earlier 777-200, −200ER and −300 versions are equipped with GE90, Pratt & Whitney PW4000 or Rolls-Royce Trent 800 engines. The 777-200LR is the world's longest-range airliner and can fly more than halfway around the globe; it holds the record for the longest distance flown non-stop by a commercial aircraft.[6][7]
United Airlines first placed the 777 into commercial airline service in June 1995. As of June 2013, 60 customers had placed orders for 1,452 aircraft of all variants, with 1,113 delivered.[1] The most common variant is the 777-200ER with 421 delivered as of June 2013.[1] Emirates operates the largest 777 fleet, with 127 passenger and freighter aircraft as of June 2013.[8] The airliner has been involved in three hull-loss accidents as of July 2013. It is rated as one of the safest aircraft based on its accident safety record and high number of flight hours.[9]
The 777 ranks as one of Boeing's best-selling models. Because of rising fuel costs, airlines have acquired the type as a comparatively fuel-efficient alternative to other wide-body jets and have increasingly deployed the aircraft on long-haul transoceanic routes. Direct market competitors include the Airbus A330-300 and A340, the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 and, in the future, the A350. The 787 Dreamliner, which entered service in 2011, shares design features with the 777.

Development

Background

In the early 1970s, the Boeing 747, McDonnell Douglas DC-10, and the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar became the first generation of wide-body passenger airliners to enter service.[10] In 1978, Boeing unveiled three new models: the twin-engine Boeing 757 to replace its venerable 727, the twin-engine 767 to challenge the Airbus A300, and a trijet 777 concept to compete with the DC-10 and L-1011.[11][12][13] The mid-size 757 and 767 launched to market success, due in part to 1980s extended-range twin-engine operational performance standards (ETOPS) regulations governing transoceanic twinjet operations.[14] These regulations allowed twin-engine airliners to make ocean crossings at up to three hours' distance from emergency diversionary airports.[15] Under ETOPS rules, airlines began operating the 767 on long-distance overseas routes that did not require the capacity of larger airliners.[14] The trijet 777 was later dropped, following marketing studies that favored the 757 and 767 variants.[16] Boeing was left with a size and range gap in its product line between the 767-300ER and the 747-400.[17]
By the late 1980s, DC-10 and L-1011 models were approaching retirement age, prompting manufacturers to develop replacement designs.[18] McDonnell Douglas was working on the MD-11, a stretched and upgraded successor of the DC-10,[18] while Airbus was developing their A330 and A340.[18] In 1986, Boeing unveiled proposals for an enlarged 767, tentatively named 767-X,[19] to target the replacement market for first-generation wide-bodies like the DC-10,[15] and to complement existing 767 and 747 models in the company lineup.[20] The initial proposal featured a longer fuselage and larger wings than the existing 767,[19] along with winglets.[21] Later plans expanded the fuselage cross-section but retained the existing 767 flight deck, nose, and other elements.[19]
Airline customers were unimpressed with the 767-X proposals, and instead wanted an even wider fuselage cross-section, fully flexible interior configurations, short- to intercontinental-range capability, and an operating cost lower than any 767 stretch.[15] Airline planners' requirements for larger aircraft had become increasingly specific, adding to the heightened competition among aircraft manufacturers.[18] By 1988, Boeing realized that the only answer was a new design, which became the 777 twinjet.[22] The company opted for the twin-engine configuration given past design successes, projected engine developments, and reduced-cost benefits.[23] On December 8, 1989, Boeing began issuing offers to airlines for the 777.[19]

Design effort

The design phase for Boeing's new twinjet was different from the company's previous commercial jetliners. For the first time, eight major airlines – All Nippon Airways, American Airlines, British Airways, Cathay Pacific Airways, Delta Air Lines, Japan Airlines, Qantas, and United Airlines – had a role in the development of the airliner.[24] This was a departure from industry practice, where manufacturers typically designed aircraft with minimal customer input.[12] The eight airlines that contributed to the design process became known within Boeing as the "Working Together" group.[24] At the first group meeting in January 1990, a 23-page questionnaire was distributed to the airlines, asking each what it wanted in the new design.[15] By March 1990, Boeing and the airlines had decided upon a basic design configuration: a cabin cross-section close to the 747's, capacity up to 325 passengers, flexible interiors, a glass cockpit, fly-by-wire controls, and 10 percent better seat-mile costs than the A330 and MD-11.[15] Boeing also selected its Everett factory in Washington, home of 747 production, as the final assembly site for the 777.[25]
On October 14, 1990, United Airlines became the 777's launch customer when it placed an order for 34 Pratt & Whitney-powered aircraft valued at US$11 billion with options on an additional 34.[26][27] The development phase coincided with United's replacement program for its aging DC-10s.[28] United required that the new aircraft be capable of flying three different routes: Chicago to Hawaii, Chicago to Europe, and non-stop from Denver, a hot and high airport, to Hawaii.[28] ETOPS certification was also a priority for United,[29] given the overwater portion of United's Hawaii routes.[26] In January 1993, a team of United developers joined other airline teams and Boeing designers at the Everett factory.[30] The 240 design teams, with up to 40 members each, addressed almost 1,500 design issues with individual aircraft components.[31] The fuselage diameter was increased to suit Cathay Pacific, the baseline model grew longer for All Nippon Airways, and British Airways' input led to added built-in testing and interior flexibility,[15] along with higher operating weight options for the basic aircraft.[32]
The 777 was the first commercial aircraft designed entirely on computer.[20][26][33] Each design drawing was created on a three-dimensional CAD software system known as CATIA, sourced from Dassault Systemes and IBM.[34] This lets engineers assemble a virtual aircraft, in simulation, to check for interference and verify that the thousands of parts fit properly—thus reducing costly rework.[35] Boeing developed their own high-performance visualization system, FlyThru, later called IVT (Integrated Visualization Tool) to support large-scale collaborative engineering design reviews, production illustrations, and other uses of the CAD data outside of engineering.[36] Boeing was initially not convinced of CATIA's abilities and built a physical mock-up of the nose section to verify its results. The test was so successful that additional mock-ups were canceled.[37]

Production and testing

The production process included substantial international content, with an unprecedented level of global subcontracting for a Boeing jetliner,[38] exceeded only by the later 787.[39] International contributors included Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Kawasaki Heavy Industries (fuselage panels),[40] Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd. (center wing section),[40] Hawker de Havilland (elevators), and Aerospace Technologies of Australia (rudder).[41] An agreement between Boeing and the Japan Aircraft Development Corporation, representing Japanese aerospace contractors, made the latter risk-sharing partners for 20 percent of the entire development program.[38] The initial 777-200 model was launched with propulsion options from three manufacturers, General Electric, Pratt & Whitney, and Rolls-Royce,[42] giving the airlines their choice of engines from competing firms.[43] Each manufacturer had agreed to develop an engine in the 77,000 lbf (340 kN) and higher thrust class (a measure of jet engine output) to power the world's largest twinjet.[42]
Aircraft factory. Rectangular building with six doors, one of which is open to reveal an emerging airliner. The background is a forest; small vehicles and taxiways surround the factory.
An Air India Boeing 777-200LR is rolled out of the Boeing Everett Factory
To accommodate production of its new airliner, Boeing doubled the size of the Everett factory at the cost of nearly US$1.5 billion[26] to provide space for two new assembly lines.[28] New production methodologies were developed, including a turn machine that could rotate fuselage subassemblies 180 degrees, giving workers access to upper body sections.[34] Major assembly of the first aircraft began on January 4, 1993.[44] By the start of production, the program had amassed 118 firm orders, with options for 95 more from 10 airlines.[45] Total investment in the program was estimated at over US$4 billion from Boeing, with an additional US$2 billion from suppliers.[46]
On April 9, 1994, the first 777, line number WA001, was rolled out in a series of 15 ceremonies held during the day to accommodate the 100,000 invited guests.[47] The first flight took place on June 12, 1994,[48] under the command of chief test pilot John E. Cashman.[49] This marked the start of an 11-month flight test program that was more extensive than testing for any previous Boeing model.[50] Nine aircraft fitted with General Electric, Pratt & Whitney, and Rolls-Royce engines[48] were flight tested at locations ranging from the desert airfield at Edwards Air Force Base in California[51] to frigid conditions in Alaska, mainly Fairbanks International Airport.[52] To satisfy ETOPS requirements, eight 180-minute single-engine test flights were performed.[53] The first aircraft built was used by Boeing's nondestructive testing campaign from 1994 to 1996, and provided data for the −200ER and −300 programs.[54] At the successful conclusion of flight testing, the 777 was awarded simultaneous airworthiness certification by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and European Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) on April 19, 1995.[48]

Entry into service

Airliner takeoff. The jet's nose is angled upwards as it lifts above the runway, with landing gear still deployed.
The first Boeing 777-200 in commercial service, United Airlines' N777UA
Boeing delivered the first 777 to United Airlines on May 15, 1995.[55][56] The FAA awarded 180-minute ETOPS clearance ("ETOPS-180") for the Pratt & Whitney PW4084-engined aircraft on May 30, 1995, making it the first airliner to carry an ETOPS-180 rating at its entry into service.[57] Longer ETOPS clearance of 207 minutes was approved the following October.[58] The first commercial flight took place on June 7, 1995 from London Heathrow Airport to Dulles International Airport near Washington, D.C.[59]
On November 12, 1995, Boeing delivered the first model with General Electric GE90-77B engines to British Airways,[60] which placed the aircraft into service five days later.[61] Initial service was affected by gearbox bearing wear issues, which caused the airline to temporarily withdraw its 777 fleet from transatlantic service in 1997.[61] British Airways' aircraft returned to full service later that year,[51] and General Electric subsequently announced engine upgrades.[51]
The first Rolls-Royce Trent 877-powered aircraft was delivered to Thai Airways International on March 31, 1996,[60] completing the introduction of the three powerplants initially developed for the airliner.[62] Each engine-aircraft combination had secured ETOPS-180 certification from the point of entry into service.[63] By June 1997, orders for the 777 numbered 323 from 25 airlines, including satisfied launch customers that had ordered additional aircraft.[48] Operations performance data established the consistent capabilities of the twinjet over long-haul transoceanic routes, leading to additional sales.[64] By 1998, dispatch reliability figures had reached a 99.96 percent rate of takeoff without delay due to technical issues,[65] and the growing number of fleet hours approached 900,000.[65]

Initial derivatives

Airliner takeoff. Side view of jet ascending in the sky, with landing gear in partially retracted position.
A Malaysia Airlines 777-200ER
After the original model, Boeing developed an increased gross weight variant of the 777-200 with greater range and payload capability.[66] Initially named 777-200IGW,[67] the 777-200ER first flew on October 7, 1996,[68] received FAA and JAA certification on January 17, 1997,[69] and entered service with British Airways on February 9, 1997.[69] Offering greater long-haul performance, the variant became the most widely ordered version of the aircraft through the early 2000s.[66] On April 2, 1997, a Malaysia Airlines −200ER named "Super Ranger" broke the great circle "distance without landing" record for an airliner by flying eastward from Boeing Field, Seattle to Kuala Lumpur, a distance of 10,823 nautical miles (20,044 km), in 21 hours and 23 minutes.[65]
Following the introduction of the −200ER, Boeing turned its attention to a stretched version of the airliner. On October 16, 1997, the 777-300 made its first flight.[68] At 242.4 ft (73.9 m) in length, the −300 became the longest airliner yet produced (until the A340-600), and had a 20 percent greater overall capacity than the standard length model.[70] The −300 was awarded type certification simultaneously from the FAA and JAA on May 4, 1998,[71] and entered service with launch customer Cathay Pacific on May 27, 1998.[68][72]
From the start of the development program, Boeing had considered building ultra-long-range variants.[73] Early plans centered on a 777-100X proposal,[74] which would have been a shortened version of the −200 with reduced weight and increased range,[74] similar to the 747SP.[75] However, the −100X would have carried fewer passengers than the −200 while having similar operating costs, leading to a higher cost per seat.[74][75] By the late 1990s, design plans shifted to longer-range versions of existing models.[74] A more powerful engine in the 100,000 lbf (440 kN) and higher thrust class was required, leading to active discussions between Boeing and the engine manufacturers. General Electric offered to develop the GE90-115B engine,[43] while Rolls-Royce proposed developing the Trent 8104 engine.[76] In 1999, Boeing announced an agreement with General Electric, beating out rival proposals.[43] As part of the deal with General Electric, Boeing agreed they would only offer GE90 engines on new 777 versions.[43]

Longer-range models


 Aircraft engine, forward-facing view with a Boeing engineer in front to demonstrate the engine's size. The engine's large circular intake contains a center hub with a swirl mark, surrounded by multiple curved fan blades.
A GE90 engine mounted on a 777-300ER with a Boeing engineer to show the engine's size. A single GE90 engine is capable of powering a Boeing 747 during cruise.[77]
On February 29, 2000, Boeing launched its next-generation twinjet program,[78] initially called 777-X,[73] and began issuing offers to airlines.[66] Development of the long-range models was slowed by the airline industry downturn, which lasted through the early 2000s.[68] The first model to emerge from the program, the 777-300ER, was launched with an order for ten aircraft from Air France,[79] along with additional commitments.[66] On February 24, 2003, the −300ER made its first flight, and the FAA and EASA (European Aviation Safety Agency, successor to the JAA) certified the model on March 16, 2004.[80] The first delivery to Air France took place on April 29, 2004.[68] The −300ER, which combined the −300's added capacity with the −200ER's range, became the top-selling 777 variant in the late 2000s,[81] gaining orders as airlines replaced comparable four-engine models with twinjets because of their lower operating costs.[82]
The second long-range model, the 777-200LR, rolled out on February 15, 2005, and completed its first flight on March 8, 2005.[68] The −200LR was certified by both the FAA and EASA on February 2, 2006,[83] and the first delivery to Pakistan International Airlines occurred on February 26, 2006.[84] On November 10, 2005, the first −200LR set a record for the longest non-stop flight of a passenger airliner by flying 11,664 nautical miles (21,602 km) eastward from Hong Kong to London.[7] Lasting 22 hours and 42 minutes, the flight surpassed the −200LR's standard design range and was logged in the Guinness World Records.[6][85]
The production freighter model, the 777F, rolled out on May 23, 2008.[86] The maiden flight of the 777F, which used the structural design and engine specifications of the −200LR[87] along with fuel tanks derived from the −300ER,[88] occurred on July 14, 2008.[89] FAA and EASA type certification for the freighter was received on February 6, 2009,[90] and the first delivery to launch customer Air France took place on February 19, 2009.[91][92]
Initially second to the 747 as Boeing's most profitable jetliner,[93] the 777 became the company's most lucrative model in the 2000s.[94] Program sales accounted for an estimated US$400 million of Boeing's pretax earnings in 2000, US$50 million more than the 747.[93] By 2004, the airliner comprised the bulk of wide-body revenues for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes division.[95] In 2007, orders for second-generation 777 models approached 350 aircraft,[96] and in November of that year, Boeing announced that all production slots were sold out to 2012.[82] The program backlog of 356 orders was valued at US$95 billion at list prices in 2008.[97]

Production updates

Aircraft takeoff. Quarter view of aircraft ascending in the sky, with landing gear still deployed.
An All Nippon Airways 777-300ER taking off
In 2010, Boeing announced plans to increase 777 production from 5 aircraft per month to 7 aircraft per month by mid-2011, and 8.3 per month by early 2013.[98] Complete assembly of each 777-300ER requires 49 days.[99] In November 2011, Boeing began assembly of the 1,000th 777, a −300ER model for Emirates;[99] the aircraft was rolled out in March 2012.[100] In late 2011, the FAA assigned a common type rating to the 787 and 777, allowing pilots qualified on either aircraft to operate both models, due to related design features.[101] The smaller 787 was the first stage of a replacement aircraft initiative called the Boeing Yellowstone Project.[102] According to industry reports, the 777 could eventually be replaced by a new product family, the Boeing Yellowstone 3, which would draw upon technologies from the 787.[96]
By the late 2000s, the 777 was facing the possibility of increased competition from Airbus' planned A350 XWB and internally from proposed variants of the 787,[96] both airliners that promise fuel efficiency improvements. As a consequence, the 777-300ER received an engine and aerodynamics improvement package for reduced drag and weight.[103] In 2010, the variant further received a 5,000 lb (2,300 kg) maximum zero-fuel weight increase, equivalent to a higher payload of 20–25 passengers; its GE90-115B1 engines received a 1–2.5 percent thrust enhancement for increased takeoff weights at higher-altitude airports.[103] More design changes were targeted for late 2012, including possible extension of the wingspan,[103] along with other major changes, including a composite wing, new powerplant, and different fuselage lengths.[103][104][105] Emirates was reported as working closely with Boeing on the project, with the possibility of being the launch customer for new versions of the 777.[106]

777X proposal

View of airport tarmac with terminal building and multiple airliners parked adjacent to it.
A row of eight Emirates 777s at Dubai International Airport. The carrier has been involved in discussions on the 777X.
In September 2011, Boeing released more details on new 777 versions, tentatively designated 777-8X and 777-9X, and popularly referred to as 777X.[107] The 777-9X would feature a fuselage stretch of 7.0 ft (2.13 m) and extended horizontal stabilizers from the −300ER to a total length of 250 ft 11 in (76.5 m) to accommodate 407 passengers.[108][109] The 777-9X's planned length exceeds the 250 ft 2 in (76.3 m) length of the Boeing 747-8, currently the world's longest airliner. Wingspan was expected to increase from the existing 212 ft 7 in (64.8 m) to 234 ft (71.3 m), and incorporate the use of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer in its construction.[88][107] In addition, gross weight was tentatively slated to decrease slightly from the current 775,000 lb (352,000 kg) to approximately 759,000 lb (344,000 kg) for the −9X model.[108] Boeing was also studying an ultra long-range replacement for the 777-200LR, conceptually dubbed the 777-8LX, which would share the –9X's fuel capacity and gross weight. Its range will be 9,480 nmi (10,910 mi; 17,560 km) compared to 9,395 nmi (10,812 mi; 17,400 km) for the −200LR.[108] The 777-8LX's fuselage length would match that of the proposed −8X at 228.17 ft (69.5 m).[107] Preliminary estimates placed entry into service for the first 777X variants at around 2019.[110][111]
In February 2012, General Electric disclosed studies on a slightly smaller engine, dubbed the GE9X, to power the 777X. It was to feature the same fan diameter from the GE90-115B (128 in or 325 cm) and a thrust decrease to new ratings of 99,500 lbf (443 kN) per engine for the –9X and –8XL, and 88,000 lbf (390 kN) for the –8X.[112][113][114] Rolls-Royce and Pratt & Whitney also proposed powerplants for the 777X, including the RB3025 concept, based off the Trent 1000 and Trent XWB engines, and an adaptation of PW1000G engine architecture to produce up to 100,000 lbf (440 kN) of thrust.[107] However, in March 2013 the General Electric GE9X was selected as the exclusive engine to power the 777X.[115] GE subsequently recently updated the GE9X specifications to reflect growing concerns that the 777X would be underpowered. Design changes included a slight increase of thrust to 102,000 lbf (450 kN) and a new fan diameter of 132 in (335 cm), giving the new engine the largest fan GE has ever produced.[116][117][118]
In August 2012, a report in the Seattle Times stated that Boeing had slowed 777X development, but still planned for it to begin service by about 2019.[119] Boeing's board of directors gave formal permission for its Commercial Airplanes division to start offering the 777X to customers in May 2013.[120]

Design

Aircraft belly section. Close view of engines, extended landing gear, and angled control flaps.
Engines, extended slats, flaps, and landing gear of an American Airlines 777-200ER
Boeing introduced a number of advanced technologies with the 777 design, including fully digital fly-by-wire controls,[121] fully software-configurable avionics, Honeywell LCD glass cockpit flight displays,[122] and the first use of a fiber optic avionics network on a commercial airliner.[123] Boeing made use of work done on the cancelled Boeing 7J7 regional jet,[124] which utilized similar versions of the chosen technologies.[124] In 2003, Boeing began offering the option of cockpit electronic flight bag computer displays.[125]

Fly-by-wire

In designing the 777 as its first fly-by-wire commercial aircraft, Boeing decided to retain conventional control yokes rather than change to sidestick controllers as used in many fly-by-wire fighter aircraft and in many Airbus airliners.[121] Along with traditional yoke and rudder controls, the cockpit features a simplified layout that retains similarities to previous Boeing models.[126] The fly-by-wire system also incorporates flight envelope protection, a system that guides pilot inputs within a computer-calculated framework of operating parameters, acting to prevent stalls and overly stressful maneuvers.[121] This system can be overridden by the pilot in command if deemed necessary.[121] The fly-by-wire system is supplemented by mechanical backup.[127]

Airframe and systems

Aircraft landing gear. Six wheel gear on the ground, with attachment assembly and gear door leading up to the aircraft belly.
The six-wheel undercarriage of a Boeing 777-300
The 777's wings feature a supercritical airfoil design that is swept back at 31.6 degrees and optimized for cruising at Mach 0.83 (revised upward after flight tests to Mach 0.84).[128] The wings are designed with increased thickness and a longer span than previous airliners, resulting in greater payload and range, improved takeoff performance, and a higher cruising altitude.[48] Folding wingtips were offered when the aircraft was launched, to appeal to airlines who might use gates made to accommodate smaller aircraft, but no airline purchased this option.[129] The wings also serve as fuel storage, with longer-range models able to carry up to 47,890 US gallons (181,300 l; 39,880 imp gal) of fuel.[88] This capacity allows the 777-200LR to operate ultra-long-distance, trans-polar routes such as Toronto to Hong Kong.[130]
The airframe incorporates the use of composite materials, which comprise nine percent of its original structural weight.[131] Elements made from composite material include the cabin floor and rudder. The main fuselage cross-section is circular[132] and tapers rearward into a blade-shaped tail cone with a port-facing auxiliary power unit.[5] The aircraft also features the largest landing gear and the biggest tires ever used in a commercial jetliner.[133] The six-wheel bogies are designed to spread the load of the aircraft over a wide area without requiring an additional centerline gear. This helps reduce weight and simplifies the aircraft's braking and hydraulic systems. Each tire of a 777-300ER six-wheel main landing gear can carry a load of 59,490 lb (26,980 kg), heavier than other wide-bodies such as the 747-400.[134] The aircraft has triple redundant hydraulic systems with only one system required for landing.[135] A ram air turbine –a small retractable propeller which can provide emergency power– is also fitted in the wing root fairing.[136]

Interior

Airliner cabin. Rows of seats arranged between two aisles. Each seatback has a monitor; light shines from the sidewalls and overhead bins.
Economy class cabin of Etihad Airways 777-300ER in a 3-3-3 layout
The 777 interior, also known as the Boeing Signature Interior, features curved panels, larger overhead bins, and indirect lighting.[61] Seating options range from six abreast in first class up to 10 across in economy.[137] At 15-inch (380 mm) by 10-inch (250 mm), the windows were the largest of any current commercial airliner until the 787.[138] The cabin also features "Flexibility Zones", which entails deliberate placement of water, electrical, pneumatic, and other connection points throughout the interior space, allowing airlines to move seats, galleys, and lavatories quickly and more easily when adjusting cabin arrangements.[137] Several aircraft have also been fitted with VIP interiors for non-airline use.[139] Boeing engineers designed a new hydraulically damped toilet seat cover hinge that closes slowly.[140]
In 2003, Boeing introduced overhead crew rests as an option on the 777.[141] Located above the main cabin and connected via staircases, the forward flight crew rest contains two seats and two bunks, while the aft cabin crew rest features multiple bunks.[141] The Signature Interior has since been adapted for other Boeing wide-body and narrow-body aircraft, including 737NG, 747-400, 757-300, and newer 767 models, including all 767-400ER models.[142][143] The 747-8 and 767-400ER have also adopted the larger, more rounded windows of the 777.
On July 7, 2011, it was reported that Boeing is considering replacing the Signature Interior on the 777 with a new interior similar to that on the 787, as part of a move towards a 'common cabin experience' across all Boeing platforms.[144]

Variants

Aircraft in flight, underside view. The jet's two wings have one engine each. The rounded nose leads to a straight body section, which tapers at the tail section with its two rear fins.
Planform view of an Air France Boeing 777-200ER in flight
Boeing uses two characteristics, fuselage length and range, to define their 777 models.[17] Fuselage length affects the number of passengers and amount of cargo that can be carried; the 777-200 and derivatives are the base size, and the aircraft was stretched into the 777-300 in 1998. In terms of range, the aircraft has been categorized into three segments based on design criteria; these were initially defined as the following:
  • A-market: up to 4,200 nautical miles (7,800 km)[145]
  • B-market: 6,600 nautical miles (12,200 km)[145]
  • C-market: 7,800 nautical miles (14,400 km)[146]
When referring to different variants, Boeing and airlines often collapse the model number (777) and the variant designator (−200 or −300) into a truncated form (e.g. "772" or "773"[147]). The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) aircraft type designator system adds a preceding manufacturer letter (e.g. "B772" or "B773").[148] Subsequent to the capacity number, designations may or may not append the range identifier (e.g. 777-300ER as "773ER",[149] "773B",[150] "77W",[151] or "B77W"[148]). These notations may be found in aircraft manuals or airline timetables.

777-200

Aircraft in flight, surrounded by white clouds. Side view of twin-engine jet in the sky.
A Boeing 777-200 in Boeing's original livery. Note the tail logos of the aircraft's firm customers below the windows under "Boeing 777".
The 777-200 was the initial A-market model. The first −200 was delivered to United Airlines on May 15, 1995.[68] With a maximum range of 5,235 nautical miles (9,695 km),[152] the −200 was chiefly aimed at U.S. domestic airline operators.[17] Nine different −200 customers have taken delivery of 88 aircraft,[1] with 85 in airline service as of July 2012.[153] The competing aircraft from Airbus is the A330-300.[154]

777-200ER

Aircraft during landing approach. Front quarter view of twin-engine jet in flight with flaps and landing gear extended.
An El Al 777-200ER landing at London Heathrow Airport
The 777-200ER ("ER" for Extended Range), the B-market version of the −200, was originally known as the 777-200IGW for its increased gross weight.[67] The −200ER features additional fuel capacity and an increased maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) over the −200.[152] Aimed at international airlines operating transatlantic routes,[17] the −200ER's maximum range is 7,700 nautical miles (14,300 km).[152] In addition to breaking the eastbound great circle "distance without landing" record, the −200ER also holds the record for the longest ETOPS-related emergency flight diversion (177 minutes under one engine), on a United Airlines flight carrying 255 passengers on March 17, 2003, over the Pacific Ocean.[155][156]
The first −200ER was delivered to British Airways on February 6, 1997.[68] Singapore Airlines, one of the type's largest customers,[1] ordered over half of its −200ERs with reduced engine thrust specifications (de-rated) for use on medium-length routes.[157][158] The de-rated engines lower MTOW, which reduces the aircraft's purchase price and landing fees, and can be re-rated to full −200ER standard for long-haul operations.[157] As of February 2013, −200ER deliveries to 33 different customers totaled 418,[1] ranking the −200ER as the most widely produced variant of the twinjet to date.[66] The newer −300ER variant, however, has accumulated an even larger number of orders.[1] As of July 2013, 418 examples of the −200ER were in airline service.[153] The competing aircraft from Airbus was the A340-300.[159]

777-300

Aircraft during landing approach. Front quarter view of twin-engine jet in flight with flaps and landing gear extended.
An Emirates 777-300 in the 2006 FIFA World Cup livery on final approach to London Heathrow Airport, England.
The stretched 777-300 was designed as an A-market replacement for 747-100s and 747-200s.[160] Compared to the older 747s, the stretched 777 has comparable passenger capacity and range, and is designed to burn one-third less fuel and have 40 percent lower maintenance costs.[70] The −300 features a 33.3 ft (10.1 m) fuselage stretch over the baseline −200. This allows seating for up to 550 passengers in a single class high-density configuration,[70] an arrangement adopted for heavily trafficked Japanese routes.[161] Because of the aircraft's length, the −300 is equipped with a tailskid and ground maneuvering cameras to aid pilots during taxi.[162] The maximum range is 6,015 nautical miles (11,140 km),[163] allowing the −300 to operate trunk routes previously flown by older 747s.[70]
After being certified simultaneously by the FAA and JAA,[71] the first −300 was delivered to Cathay Pacific on May 21, 1998.[68][72] Eight different −300 customers have taken delivery of 60 aircraft,[1] and all were in airline service as of July 2012.[153] However, following the introduction of the longer-range −300ER in 2004, all operators have selected the ER version of the −300 model.[1] The −300 has no direct Airbus rival, but the A340-600 has been offered in competition.[164][165]

777-200LR

Aircraft landing approach. Front quarter view of twin-engine jet in flight with flaps and landing gear extended.
The first 777-200LR built, in service with Pakistan International Airlines
The 777-200LR ("LR" for Longer Range), the C-market model, became the world's longest-range commercial airliner when it entered service in 2006.[166][167] Boeing named this aircraft the Worldliner, highlighting its ability to connect almost any two airports in the world,[7] although it is still subject to ETOPS restrictions.[168] It holds the world record for the longest nonstop flight by a commercial airliner,[169] and has a maximum design range of 9,380 nautical miles (17,370 km).[85] The −200LR was intended for ultra-long-haul routes such as Los Angeles to Singapore.[73]
Developed alongside the −300ER, the −200LR features an increased MTOW and three optional auxiliary fuel tanks in the rear cargo hold.[166] Other new features include raked wingtips, redesigned main landing gear, and additional structural strengthening.[166] As with the −300ER and 777F, the −200LR is equipped with wingtip extensions of 12.8 ft (3.90 m).[166] The −200LR is powered by GE90-110B1 or GE90-115B turbofans.[88] The first −200LR was delivered to Pakistan International Airlines on February 26, 2006.[84][170] As of February 2013, nine different −200LR customers have taken delivery of 55 aircraft, with 3 unfilled orders.[1] Airlines operated 52 of the −200LR variant as of July 2012.[153] The closest competing aircraft from Airbus was the A340-500HGW.[166]

777-300ER

Aircraft landing approach. Side view of twin-engine jet in flight with flaps and landing gear extended.
An Air Canada 777-300ER landing with flaps deployed
The 777-300ER ("ER" for Extended Range) is the B-market version of the −300. It features raked and extended wingtips, a new main landing gear, reinforced nose gear, and extra fuel tanks.[171][172] It also has a strengthened fuselage, wings, empennage, and engine attachments.[88] The standard GE90-115B turbofan is the world's most powerful jet engine in service, with a maximum thrust of 115,300 lbf (513 kN).[171] Its maximum range is 7,930 nautical miles (14,690 km),[173] made possible by higher MTOW and increased fuel capacity.[164][165] The −300ER can fly approximately 34 percent further than the −300 with a full load of passengers and cargo.[88] Following flight testing, aerodynamics refinements have reduced fuel burn by an additional 1.4 percent.[81][174]
The first −300ER was delivered to Air France on April 29, 2004.[68][175] The −300ER is the best-selling 777 variant, having surpassed the −200ER in 2010,[1] and since its launch the model has been a primary driver of the twinjet's sales past the rival A330/340 series.[96] Using two engines produces a typical operating cost advantage of around 8–9 percent for the −300ER over the A340-600,[176] along with a 20 percent fuel burn advantage over the 747-400.[82] Several airlines have acquired the −300ER as a 747-400 replacement amid rising fuel prices.[82] As of June 2013, −300ER deliveries to 24 different customers totaled 412, with 284 unfilled orders.[1] Operators had 346 aircraft in service as of July 2012.[153] The −300ER's direct Airbus competitors have included the A340-600HGW and the upcoming A350-1000.[96][165]

777 Freighter

Side view of aircraft over runway. Runway surfaces in foreground and forest in background.
The first 777 Freighter, destined for Air France, during a test flight
The 777 Freighter (777F) is an all-cargo version of the twinjet, and shares features with the −200LR; these include its airframe, engines,[177] and fuel capacity.[88] With a maximum payload of 226,000 lb (103,000 kg),[88] cargo capacity is similar to the 243,000 lb (110,000 kg) of the 747-200F.[82] The freighter has a range of 4,900 nmi (9,070 km) at maximum payload,[88] although greater range is possible if less cargo weight is carried.[178]
As the aircraft promises improved operating economics compared to existing freighters,[82] airlines have targeted the 777F as a replacement for older freighters including the 747-200F and MD-11F.[87][179] The first 777F was delivered to Air France on February 19, 2009.[91] As of February 2013, 74 freighters had been delivered to eleven different customers, with 53 unfilled orders.[1] Operators had 61 of the 777F in service as of July 2012.[153]
In the 2000s, Boeing began studying the conversion of 777-200ER and −200 passenger airliners into freighters, under the name 777 BCF (Boeing Converted Freighter).[180] The company has been in discussion with several airline customers, including FedEx Express, UPS Airlines, and GE Commercial Aviation Services, to provide launch orders for a 777 BCF program.[181]

777 Tanker (KC-777)

The KC-777 is a proposed tanker version of the 777. In September 2006, Boeing publicly announced that it would produce the KC-777, if the United States Air Force (USAF) requires a larger tanker than the KC-767. The 777 tanker would also be able to transport more cargo or personnel.[182][183][184] In April 2007, Boeing instead offered its KC-767 Advanced Tanker for USAF's KC-X competition.[185]

Operators

 Aircraft takeoff. Side view of twin-engine jet in flight with flaps and landing gear extended, with upswept wings.
A Japan Airlines Boeing 777-200 during takeoff
The customers that have received the most 777s are ILFC, Emirates, Singapore Airlines, United Airlines, and Air France.[1] Emirates is the largest airline operator as of July 2012,[153] and is the only customer to have ordered all 777 variants, including the −200, −200ER, −300, −300ER, and 777F.[1][186] The 1,000th 777 off the production line, a −300ER set to be Emirates' 102nd 777, was unveiled at a factory ceremony in March 2012.[100]
A total of 1,017 aircraft (all variants) were in airline service as of July 2012, with Emirates (108), United Airlines (74), Air France (64), Singapore Airlines (59), All Nippon Airways (51), British Airways (49), American Airlines (47), Japan Airlines (46), Cathay Pacific (45), Korean Air (32), and other operators with fewer aircraft of the type.[153]

Orders and deliveries

Orders and deliveries
OrdersDeliveries
TypeTotalUnfilledTotal2013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998199719961995
777-2008888132139310113213
777-200ER42224202303431923132229415542635048
777-200LR5945501691611102
777-300606014296341714
777-300ER69629040633605240524753392010
777F1275176419152216
Total1,4523471,10539837374886183654036394761558374593213
Data through May 2013[1][187][188]
ICAO designation[148]Model series
B772777-200
777-200ER
B77L777-200LR
777F
B773777-300
B77W777-300ER

Accidents and incidents

Heat exchanger. Circular latticework with an uneven covering of small particles over part of its surface.
Laboratory replication of ice crystals clogging the fuel-oil heat exchanger on a Rolls-Royce Trent 800 engine, from the NTSB report on the BA38 and DL18 incidents[189]
As of 2013, the 777 has been in eight aviation occurrences,[190] including three hull-loss accidents,[191] and three hijackings.[192] Before 2013, the only fatality involving the twinjet occurred in a refueling fire at Denver International Airport on September 5, 2001, during which a ground worker sustained fatal burns.[193] The aircraft, operated by British Airways, suffered fire damage to the lower wing panels and engine housing; it was later repaired and put back into service.[193][194]
The type's first hull-loss occurred on January 17, 2008, when British Airways Flight 38, a 777-200ER with Rolls-Royce Trent 895 engines flying from Beijing to London, crash-landed approximately 1,000 feet (300 m) short of Heathrow Airport's runway 27L and slid onto the runway's threshold. There were 47 injuries and no fatalities. The impact damaged the landing gear, wing roots, and engines, and the aircraft was written off.[195][196] Upon investigation, the accident was blamed on ice crystals from the fuel system clogging the fuel-oil heat exchanger (FOHE).[189] In 2009, air accident investigators called for a redesign of this component on the Trent 800 series engine.[197] Redesigned fuel oil heat exchangers were installed in British Airways' 777s by October 2009.[198]
Two other minor momentary losses of thrust with Trent 895 engines occurred in February and November 2008.[199][200] The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigators concluded that, just as on BA38, the loss of power was caused by ice in the fuel clogging the fuel-oil heat exchanger. As a result, the heat exchanger was redesigned.[189]
The type's second hull-loss occurred on July 29, 2011, when an EgyptAir 777-200ER registered as SU-GBP suffered a cockpit fire while parked at the gate at Cairo International Airport.[201] The plane was successfully evacuated with no injuries,[201] and airport fire teams extinguished the fire.[202] The aircraft sustained structural, heat, and smoke damage, and was written off.[201][202] Investigators focused on a possible electrical fault with a supply hose in the cockpit crew oxygen system.[201]
The Boeing 777's third hull loss occurred on July 6, 2013, when Asiana Airlines Flight 214, 777-200ER registered HL7742,[203] crashed while landing at San Francisco International Airport after touching down short of the runway. Most of the passengers and crew evacuated before fire destroyed the aircraft, but 2 of the 307 on board were killed, marking the first fatalities in a crash involving a 777.[204][205] An NTSB investigation is underway.[206]

Specifications

Specifications by model
Model777-200777-200ER777-200LR777 Freighter777-300777-300ER777-8X[207][208]777-9X[207][208]
Cockpit crewTwo
Seating capacity,
typical
314 (3-class)[209]
400 (2-class)
440 (maximum)
N/A
(cargo)
386 (3-class)[209]
451 (2-class)
550 (maximum)
353 (3-class)407 (3-class)
Length209 ft 1 in (63.7 m)242 ft 4 in (73.9 m)228 ft 2 in (69.5 m)250 ft 11 in (76.5 m)
Wingspan199 ft 11 in (60.9 m)212 ft 7 in (64.8 m)199 ft 11 in (60.9 m)212 ft 7 in (64.8 m)Unfolded: 233 ft 3 in (71.1 m)
Folded: ~211 ft 3 in (64.4 m)
Wing sweepback31.64°N/A
Tail height60 ft 9 in (18.5 m)61 ft 1 in (18.6 m)60 ft 8 in (18.5 m)N/A
Cabin width19 ft 3 in (5.87 m)19 ft 7 in (5.97 m)[210]
Fuselage width20 ft 4 in (6.20 m)
Maximum cargo capacity5,720 cu ft (162 m3)
32× LD3
23,051 cu ft (653 m3)
37× pallets
7,640 cu ft (216 m3)
44× LD3
N/A
Empty weight, operating297,300 lb
(134,800 kg)
304,500 lb
(138,100 kg)
320,000 lb
(145,150 kg)
318,300 lb
(144,400 kg)
353,800 lb
(160,500 kg)
370,000 lb
(167,800 kg)
N/A
Maximum landing weight445,000 lb
(201,840 kg)
470,000 lb
(213,180 kg)
492,000 lb
(223,168 kg)
575,000 lb
(260,816 kg)
524,000 lb
(237,680 kg)
554,000 lb
(251,290 kg)
N/A
Maximum Takeoff Weight
(MTOW)
545,000 lb
(247,200 kg)
656,000 lb
(297,550 kg)
766,000 lb
(347,500 kg)
766,800 lb
(347,800 kg)
660,000 lb
(299,370 kg)
775,000 lb
(351,500 kg)
Typical cruise speedMach 0.84 (560 mph, 905 km/h, 490 knots) at a cruise altitude of 35,000 ft (11,000 m)N/A
Maximum speedMach 0.89 (590 mph, 950 km/h, 512 knots) at a cruise altitude of 35,000 ft (11,000 m)N/A
Maximum range
(with maximum payload)
5,240 nmi
(9,700 km, 6,027 mi)
7,725 nmi
(14,310 km, 8,892 mi)
9,380 nmi
(17,370 km, 10,793 mi)
4,900 nmi
(9,070 km, 5,636 mi)
6,005 nmi
(11,120 km, 6,910 mi)
7,930 nmi
(14,690 km, 9,128 mi)
9,480 nmi
(17,557 km, 10,909 mi)
8,100 nmi
(15,001 km, 9,321 mi)
Takeoff distance at MTOW
(sea level, ISA)
8,000 ft
2,440 m
11,100 ft
3,380 m
9,200 ft
2,800 m
9,300 ft
2,830 m
10,600 ft
3,230 m
10,000 ft
3,050 m
N/A
Maximum fuel capacity31,000 US gal
(117,348 L)
45,220 US gal
(171,176 L)
47,890 US gal
(181,283 L)
45,220 US gal
(171,176 L)
47,890 US gal
(181,283 L)
N/A
Service ceiling43,100 ft (13,140 m)
Engine (×2)PW 4077
RR 877
GE90-77B
PW 4090
RR 895
GE90-94B
GE90-110B1
GE90-115B1
PW 4098
RR 892
GE90-92B/-94B
GE90-115B1GE9X
Thrust (×2)PW: 77,000 lbf (342 kN)
RR: 76,000 lbf (338 kN)
GE: 77,000 lbf (342 kN)
PW: 90,000 lbf (400 kN)
RR: 93,400 lbf (415 kN)
GE: 93,700 lbf (417 kN)
GE −110B: 110,100 lbf (490 kN)
GE −115B: 115,300 lbf (512 kN)
PW: 98,000 lbf (436 kN)
RR: 93,400 lbf (415 kN)
GE: 92,000/93,700 lbf (409 kN/418 kN)
GE: 115,540 lbf (514 kN)102,000 lbf (450 kN)
Sources: Boeing 777 specifications,[88][211] Boeing 777 Airport planning report,[212] and other sources[213][214]

See also

Comparison chart showing front, side, and dorsal views of the 777.
Diagram of 777-200ER/300ER
Related development
Aircraft of comparable role, configuration and era
Related lists

References

Notes
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p "777 Model Orders and Deliveries summary". Boeing. May 31, 2013. Retrieved July 7, 2013. 
  2. ^ a b c d "Boeing Commercial Airplanes prices". Boeing. Retrieved August 8, 2012. 
  3. ^ Robertson, David (March 13, 2009). "Workhorse jet has been huge success with airlines that want to cut costs". The Times (UK). Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  4. ^ Grantham, Russell (February 29, 2008). "Delta's new Boeing 777 can fly farther, carry more". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved June 30, 2009. 
  5. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 1996, p. 89
  6. ^ a b Glenday 2007, p. 200
  7. ^ a b c "Flight of Boeing’s 777 Breaks Distance Record". The New York Times. November 10, 2005. Retrieved June 2, 2013. 
  8. ^ "Emirates Fleet". Retrieved June 30, 2013. 
  9. ^ "The world's top-five safest aircraft". The Vancouver Sun. 9 August 2011. Retrieved 17 June 2013. 
  10. ^ Wells & Rodrigues 2004, p. 146
  11. ^ "The 1980s Generation". Time. August 14, 1978. Retrieved July 19, 2008. 
  12. ^ a b Weiner, Eric (December 19, 1990). "New Boeing Airliner Shaped by the Airlines". The New York Times. Retrieved May 8, 2011. 
  13. ^ Eden 2008, pp. 98, 102–103
  14. ^ a b Eden 2008, pp. 99–104
  15. ^ a b c d e f Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 128
  16. ^ Yenne 2002, p. 33
  17. ^ a b c d Eden 2008, p. 112
  18. ^ a b c d Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 126
  19. ^ a b c d Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 127
  20. ^ a b Eden 2008, p. 106
  21. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 11
  22. ^ Norris & Wagner 1996, pp. 9–14
  23. ^ Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 129
  24. ^ a b Birtles 1998, pp. 13–16
  25. ^ Lane, Polly (December 1, 1991). "Aerospace Company May Be Rethinking Commitment To The Puget Sound Area". Seattle Times. Retrieved October 15, 2009. 
  26. ^ a b c d Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 132
  27. ^ "Business Notes: Aircraft". Time. October 29, 1990. Retrieved July 19, 2008. 
  28. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 1996, p. 14
  29. ^ Norris & Wagner 1996, p. 13
  30. ^ Norris & Wagner 1996, p. 15
  31. ^ Norris & Wagner 1996, p. 20
  32. ^ "BA Gets New 777 Model". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. February 10, 1997. Retrieved May 8, 2011. 
  33. ^ An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering. Cl-Engineering. p. 19. ISBN 978-1-111-57680-6. "As an example, the Boeing 777 was the first commercial airliner developed through a paperless computer-aided design process." 
  34. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 133
  35. ^ Norris & Wagner 1999, pp. 133–134
  36. ^ Abarbanel & McNeely 1996, p. 124 Note: IVT is still active at Boeing in 2010 with over 29,000 users.
  37. ^ Norris & Wagner 1996, p. 21
  38. ^ a b Eden 2008, p. 108
  39. ^ Hise, Phaedra (July 9, 2007). "The power behind Boeing's 787 Dreamliner". CNN. Retrieved October 15, 2009. 
  40. ^ a b Richardson, Michael (February 23, 1994). "Demand for Airliners Is Expected to Soar: Asia's High-Flying Market". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  41. ^ Sabbagh 1995, pp. 112–114
  42. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 1999, pp. 136–137
  43. ^ a b c d "A question of choice". Flight International. January 3, 2000. Retrieved March 29, 2009. 
  44. ^ Sabbagh 1995, pp. 168–169
  45. ^ Norris, Guy (March 31, 1993). "Boeing prepares for stretched 777 launch". Flight International. Retrieved May 8, 2011. 
  46. ^ Norris & Wagner 1996, p. 7
  47. ^ Sabbagh 1995, pp. 256–259
  48. ^ a b c d e Eden 2008, p. 107
  49. ^ Birtles 1998, p. 25
  50. ^ Andersen, Lars (August 16, 1993). "Boeing's 777 Will Be Tops When It Comes To ETOPS". Seattle Times. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  51. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 144
  52. ^ Birtles 1998, p. 40
  53. ^ Birtles 1998, p. 20
  54. ^ Birtles 1999, p. 34
  55. ^ Birtles 1998, p. 69
  56. ^ "First Boeing 777 delivery goes to United Airlines". Business Wire. May 15, 1995. Retrieved December 1, 2008. 
  57. ^ Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 139
  58. ^ 180-minute ETOPS approval was granted to the General Electric GE90 powered 777 on October 3, 1996, and to the Rolls-Royce Trent 800-powered 777 on October 10, 1996.
  59. ^ Birtles 1998, p. 80
  60. ^ a b Eden 2004, p. 115.
  61. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 143
  62. ^ Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 147
  63. ^ Norris & Wagner 1999, pp. 146–147
  64. ^ "Boeing Roars Ahead". BusinessWeek. November 6, 2005. Retrieved December 1, 2008. 
  65. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 148
  66. ^ a b c d e Eden 2008, p. 113
  67. ^ a b Eden 2008, pp. 112–113
  68. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "The Boeing 777 Program Background". Boeing. Retrieved June 6, 2009. 
  69. ^ a b Haenggi, Michael. "777 Triple Seven Revolution". Boeing Widebodies. St. Paul, Minnesota: MBI, 2003. ISBN 0-7603-0842-X.
  70. ^ a b c d Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 151
  71. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 125
  72. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 1999, pp. 151–157
  73. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 165
  74. ^ a b c d Norris & Wagner 1999, pp. 165–167
  75. ^ a b Norris, Guy (May 15, 1996). "Boeing sets decision date for new versions of 777". Flight International. Retrieved March 29, 2009. 
  76. ^ "Aero-Engines – Rolls-Royce Trent". Jane's Transport Business News. February 13, 2001. Archived from the original on March 25, 2008. Retrieved March 21, 2009. 
  77. ^ General Electric Biggest Jet Engine for B-777. History.com. 2008. Retrieved June 12, 2012. 
  78. ^ "Boeing launches stretch 777 jetliner". Deseret News. February 29, 2000. Retrieved October 28, 2009. 
  79. ^ Song, Kyung (October 5, 2000). "Air France orders 10 777s". Seattle Times. Retrieved September 15, 2009. 
  80. ^ Dinell, David (March 16, 2004). "Boeing's 777-300ER receives certification". Wichita Business Journal. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  81. ^ a b Ostrower, Jon (August 7, 2008). "Green and versatile". Flight International. Retrieved March 29, 2009. 
  82. ^ a b c d e f Thomas, Geoffrey (June 13, 2008). "Boeing under pressure as demand rises for fuel-saver 777". The Australian. Retrieved June 20, 2008. 
  83. ^ Wallace, James (February 3, 2006). "777 distance champ is certified for service". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved December 10, 2008. 
  84. ^ a b Chaudhry, Muhammad Bashir (November 18, 2008). "Modernization of PIA fleet". Pakistan Dawn. Retrieved February 12, 2008. 
  85. ^ a b "Boeing 777-200LR and 777-300ER Technical Characteristics". Boeing. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  86. ^ Trimble, Stephen (May 23, 2008). "Boeing 777F makes its debut ahead of flight test phase". Flight International. Retrieved June 6, 2008. 
  87. ^ a b "Datafile: Boeing 777F". Flug Revue. 2006. Archived from the original on January 30, 2008. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  88. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "Boeing 777 – Technical Information". Boeing. Retrieved October 9, 2011. 
  89. ^ Ionides, Nicholas (July 15, 2008). "Boeing 777F flies for the first time". Flight International. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  90. ^ "European Aviation Safety Agency Validates FAA Certification of Boeing 777 Freighter". Reuters. February 6, 2009. Retrieved July 1, 2011. 
  91. ^ a b Ionides, Nicholas. "First 777 freighter delivered to Air France". Air Transport Intelligence via Flightglobal.com. Retrieved February 20, 2009. 
  92. ^ "Boeing launches cargo version of 777". Associated Press. May 24, 2005. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  93. ^ a b Song, Kyung (June 4, 2000). "Who builds a better widebody?". Seattle Times. Retrieved October 29, 2009. 
  94. ^ Ray, Susanna (April 21, 2009). "Boeing Earnings Buffeted by 777 Production Slump". Bloomberg. Retrieved October 29, 2009. 
  95. ^ Gates, Dominic (November 16, 2004). "Freighter version of 777 jetliner in works". Seattle Times. Retrieved October 29, 2009. 
  96. ^ a b c d e "Airbus A350 XWB puts pressure on Boeing 777". Flight International. November 26, 2007. Retrieved December 1, 2008. 
  97. ^ Hepher, Tim (September 8, 2008). "Sizing up Boeing's plane portfolio". Reuters. Retrieved June 3, 2011. 
  98. ^ Ranson, Lori (December 20, 2010). "Boeing unveils another increase in Boeing 777 production". Air Transport Intelligence via Flightglobal.com. Retrieved January 2, 2011. 
  99. ^ a b "Boeing Begins Work on 1,000th 777". Boeing. November 7, 2011. Retrieved November 8, 2011. 
  100. ^ a b "Emirates airline receives 1,000th Boeing 777". Gulf News. March 3, 2012. Retrieved March 3, 2012. 
  101. ^ "Flight Standardization Board Report". Federal Aviation Administration. August 25, 2011. Retrieved November 8, 2011. 
  102. ^ Norris & Wagner 2009, pp. 32–35.
  103. ^ a b c d "Order trickle continues for in-production widebodies". Flight International. September 8, 2008. Retrieved November 2, 2010. 
  104. ^ Ostrower, Jon (September 8, 2008). "Boeing looks to extend 777 wingspan for incremental improvement package". Flight International. Retrieved March 17, 2010. 
  105. ^ Ostrower, Jon (June 21, 2011). "PARIS: Boeing mulls 777-9X". Air Transport Intelligence via Flightglobal.com. Retrieved July 4, 2011. 
  106. ^ "Emirates may be launch customer for new Boeing 777". Seattle Post-Intelligencer, September 12, 2011. Retrieved September 14, 2011.
  107. ^ a b c d "A special look at the future prospects of the Boeing 777". Flight International. March 2012. Retrieved March 10, 2012. 
  108. ^ a b c Ostrower, John (March 7, 2012). "Boeing homes in on late-2012 launch for 777 successor". Flight International. Retrieved March 20, 2012. 
  109. ^ Ostrower, Jon (February 13, 2012). "Boeing studies ultra long-range 777-8LX concept". Air Transport Intelligence via Flightglobal.com. Retrieved February 13, 2012. 
  110. ^ Tsang, Daniel (September 14, 2011). "New Boeing 777X likely to be a highly efficient derivative". Aspire Aviation. Retrieved November 12, 2011. 
  111. ^ Tsang, Daniel (February 9, 2012). "Boeing develops 777X to challenge Airbus A350". Aspire Aviation. Retrieved August 25, 2012. 
  112. ^ Ostrower, John (March 7, 2012). "GE plans 10% fuel burn improvement for GE9X engine". Flight International. Retrieved March 20, 2012. 
  113. ^ Ostrower, Jon (September 14, 2011). "Next generation 777 comes into focus". Flight International. Retrieved November 12, 2011. 
  114. ^ Ostrower, Jon (September 14, 2011). "Boeing's 777-9X comes into focus with a massive CFRP wing". Flightblogger. Retrieved November 12, 2011. 
  115. ^ "Boeing selects GE as sole engine partner on next 777 plane". Reuters. March 15, 2013. Retrieved March 19, 2013. 
  116. ^ "GE9X - GE Aviation". General Electric. 2013. Retrieved July 1, 2013. 
  117. ^ The New GE9X Engine - GE Aviation. General Electric. June 17, 2013. Retrieved July 1, 2013. 
  118. ^ Alcock, Charles (June 16, 2013). "GE Pushes Envelope With GE9X for New Boeing 777". Aviation International News. Retrieved July 1, 2013. 
  119. ^ Gates, Dominic. "Boeing slows the pace on 777X" Seattle Times, August 22, 2012. Retrieved: August 25, 2012.
  120. ^ Norris, Guy (May 1, 2013). "Boeing Board Gives Approval To Offer 777X". Aviation Week & Space Technology. Retrieved July 1, 2013. 
  121. ^ a b c d North, David. "Finding Common Ground in Envelope Protection Systems". Aviation Week & Space Technology, August 28, 2008, pp. 66–68.
  122. ^ Birtles 1998, p. 57
  123. ^ Norris & Wagner 1996, p. 47
  124. ^ a b Sweetman, Bill (September 1, 2005). "The Short, Happy Life of the Prop-fan". Air & Space. Retrieved December 1, 2008. 
  125. ^ Corliss, Bryan (November 5, 2003). "New Boeing 777 Boasts Breakthrough Video System". Forbes. Retrieved May 5, 2009. 
  126. ^ Ropelewski, Robert (June 1995). "Flying the Boeing 777". Interavia Business & Technology. Retrieved March 21, 2009. 
  127. ^ Newhouse 2008, p. 106
  128. ^ Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 130
  129. ^ "Type Acceptance Report – Boeing 777". Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand. Retrieved December 1, 2008. 
  130. ^ Morris, Doug (March 2012). "What determines the kind of aircraft that will be used for a particular route?". enRoute. 
  131. ^ Norris & Wagner 1996, p. 35
  132. ^ Norris & Wagner 1996, p. 92
  133. ^ Eden 2008, p. 111
  134. ^ Turner, Aimee (March 28, 2006). "ADP to revamp runway at Orly". Flight International. Retrieved April 2, 2009. 
  135. ^ Birtles 1998, p. 66
  136. ^ Birtles 1998, p. 60
  137. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 32–33
  138. ^ Wallace, James (November 26, 2008). "Continental plans Dreamliner seats to be roomy, with a view". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved July 1, 2011. 
  139. ^ "Lufthansa Technik turns out first customized VIP Boeing 777". Lufthansa Technik. December 22, 2000. Archived from the original on 20090615231836. Retrieved October 25, 2008. 
  140. ^ Stover, Dawn (June 1994). "The newest way to fly". Popular Science: 78–79, 104. Retrieved March 10, 2011. 
  141. ^ a b Wallace, James (February 4, 2003). "Boeing adds places for crews to snooze". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved June 3, 2011. 
  142. ^ Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 122
  143. ^ Norris & Wagner 1999, pp. 46, 112
  144. ^ Kirby, Mark (July 7, 2011). "Boeing eyes 'common cabin experience' across platforms". Air Transport Intelligence via Flightglobal.com. Retrieved July 8, 2011. 
  145. ^ a b Birtles 1999, pp. 103, 105
  146. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 102
  147. ^ "About our operating aircraft". Japan Airlines. Retrieved October 25, 2009. 
  148. ^ a b c "ICAO Document 8643." International Civil Aviation Organization. Retrieved: February 6, 2011.
  149. ^ John, Danny (September 12, 2007). "Air NZ must ask shareholders". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved March 30, 2009. 
  150. ^ "Cathay Pacific puts its trust in Boeing". Asia Times Online. December 3, 2005. Retrieved March 30, 2009. 
  151. ^ "Air Canada – 777-300ER (77W)". Air Canada. Retrieved March 30, 2009. 
  152. ^ a b c "777-200/-200ER Technical Characteristics". Boeing. November 21, 2008. Retrieved June 6, 2009. 
  153. ^ a b c d e f g h "World Airliner Census". Flight International, August 28–September 3, 2012.
  154. ^ Wallace, James (November 19, 2001). "Aerospace Notebook: Conner's best bet – Let it ride on the 777s but airlines aren't ready to commit to 200LR model". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved May 8, 2011. 
  155. ^ "Still Tops for ETOPS". Air Safety Week. April 14, 2003. Retrieved May 23, 2009. 
  156. ^ "Divert Details". Air Safety Week. March 24, 2003. Retrieved May 23, 2009. 
  157. ^ a b "SIA's new long-haul LCC to start with 400-seat B777s, plans 16-aircraft fleet within four years". CAPA Centre for Aviation. September 1, 2011. Retrieved March 22, 2012. 
  158. ^ "Our Fleet". Singapore Airlines. 2012. Retrieved March 22, 2012. 
  159. ^ Wall, Robert (October 30, 2005). "Boeing's Interest Focuses on 747 Advanced, Not 787-10". Aviation Week & Space Technology. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  160. ^ Norris & Wagner 1999, pp. 151–152
  161. ^ Birtles 1998, p. 67
  162. ^ Norris & Wagner 1999, pp. 152–156
  163. ^ "777-300 Technical Characteristics". Boeing. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  164. ^ a b "Datafile: Boeing 777-300". Flug Revue. 2006. Archived from the original on January 30, 2008. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  165. ^ a b c "Datafile: Boeing 777-300ER". Flug Revue. 2006. Archived from the original on January 29, 2008. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  166. ^ a b c d e "Datafile: Boeing 777-200LR Worldiner". Flug Revue. 2006. Archived from the original on June 23, 2008. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  167. ^ Field, David (March 17, 2008). "Delta pushes Boeing to squeeze more range from 777-200LR". Flight International. Retrieved December 2, 2008. 
  168. ^ "FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet T00001SE". Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved November 5, 2009. 
  169. ^ Phillips, Don (November 11, 2005). "New Boeing 777 breaks distance record". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved June 2, 2013. 
  170. ^ "Deliveries". Boeing. Retrieved September 8, 2009. 
  171. ^ a b Eisenstein, Paul (July 2004). "Biggest Jet Engine". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved June 3, 2011. 
  172. ^ Norris, Guy (January 2003). "Long Ranger". Flight International. Retrieved December 2, 2008. 
  173. ^ Cheung, Clare; Irene Shen (November 8, 2007). "Cathay Pacific Orders 17 Boeing Jets". Bloomberg. Retrieved December 2, 2008. 
  174. ^ Thomas, Geoffrey. "Boeing nose ahead in Qantas order race". The Australian, December 2, 2005. Retrieved: March 20, 2009.
  175. ^ "Air France takes delivery of Boeing 777-300ER". Logistics Business Review. May 5, 2008. Retrieved October 20, 2008. 
  176. ^ Kingsley Jones, Ben; Guy Norris (November 29, 2005). "Enhanced A340 to take on 777". Flight International. Retrieved April 2, 2009. 
  177. ^ Norris, Guy (May 16, 2006). "Cargo Kings: new Boeing 777F and 747-8F programmes". Flight International. Retrieved March 29, 2009. 
  178. ^ Wallace, James (November 15, 2004). "Boeing seeks cargo 777 orders". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved December 3, 2008. 
  179. ^ "Air France to buy Boeing 777 freighters". USA Today. Associated Press. March 25, 2005. Retrieved October 19, 2010. 
  180. ^ Sobie, Brendan (September 23, 2008). "Boeing reveals cargo conversion development studies for 777". Air Transport Intelligence via Flightglobal.com. Retrieved October 19, 2010. 
  181. ^ Sobie, Brendan (October 19, 2010). "Boeing expects to secure 777BCF launch customer in early 2011". Air Transport Intelligence via Flightglobal.com. Retrieved October 19, 2010. 
  182. ^ Sachdev, Ameet (September 27, 2006). "Boeing adds 777 to tanker mix". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved May 8, 2011. 
  183. ^ Norris, Guy (October 3, 2006). "US Air Force tanker RFP reveals KC-777 offer". Flight International. Retrieved April 21, 2009. 
  184. ^ "Ready to fill 'er up". Boeing. November 2006. Retrieved April 21, 2009. 
  185. ^ Vandruff, Ken (April 11, 2007). "Boeing submits KC-767 tanker proposal". Wichita Business Journal. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  186. ^ Gale, Ivan (July 19, 2010). "Emirates $9bn deal beats expectations". The National. Retrieved March 3, 2012. 
  187. ^ "Current Year Deliveries". Boeing. February 2013. Retrieved March 14, 2013. 
  188. ^ "Orders and Deliveries search page". Boeing. February 2013. Retrieved March 14, 2013. 
  189. ^ a b c "Safety Recommendation: In reply refer to: A-09-17 (Urgent) and −18". Mayday, Discovery Channel. March 11, 2009. 
  190. ^ "Boeing 777 occurrences". Aviation Safety Network. July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  191. ^ "Boeing 777 hull losses". Aviation Safety Network. July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  192. ^ "Boeing 777 Accident Statistics". Aviation Safety Network. July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  193. ^ a b "British Airways Flight 2019 ground fire". Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved November 21, 2008. 
  194. ^ "DEN01FA157 entry". National Transportation Safety Board. February 24, 2005. Retrieved January 2, 2011. 
  195. ^ "Interim Management Statement". British Airways. February 1, 2008. Retrieved November 21, 2008. 
  196. ^ "Report on the accident to Boeing 777-236ER, G-YMMM, at London Heathrow Airport on 17 January 2008". Air Accidents Investigation Branch. February 9, 2010. Retrieved February 9, 2010. 
  197. ^ "'High risk' of plane fault repeat". BBC News. March 13, 2009. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  198. ^ Woodman, Peter (February 9, 2010). "Ice 'probable cause' of Heathrow crash-landing". The Independent (UK). Retrieved December 11, 2011. 
  199. ^ Kaminski-Morrow, David (February 29, 2008). "American investigates as 777 engine fails to respond to throttle". Flight International. Retrieved March 20, 2009. 
  200. ^ "NTSB Investigates B777 Uncommanded Engine Rollback". Air Safety Week. December 22, 2008. Retrieved April 2, 2009. 
  201. ^ a b c d "EgyptAir Flight 667 ground fire". Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved January 2, 2012. 
  202. ^ a b "Recent Incidents / Accidents Worldwide". Jet Airliner Crash Data Evaluation Centre. July 2011. Retrieved January 2, 2012. 
  203. ^ http://planefinder.net/data/airplanes/HL7742
  204. ^ "Asiana 777 Crash Lands In San Francisco". Aviation Week. July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  205. ^ "At least two dead, 10 critically injured in Boeing 777 crash". KTVU
  206. ^ "Asiana 777-200ER crashes at San Francisco airport". Flight International. July 6, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2013. 
  207. ^ a b "Boeing To Make Up Lost Grounds On All Fronts". Aspire Aviation. Retrieved June 20, 2013. 
  208. ^ a b "Boeing 777X To Spark Mini-Jumbo War". Aspire Aviation. Retrieved June 20, 2013. 
  209. ^ a b "777 Characteristics". Boeing. Retrieved October 10, 2012. 
  210. ^ "Boeing's 777-9X comes into focus with a massive CFRP wing". October 31, 2011. Retrieved June 30, 2013. 
  211. ^ "777 payload-range capability". Boeing. 2009. Retrieved October 29, 2012. 
  212. ^ "777 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning". Boeing. May 2011. Retrieved October 9, 2011. 
  213. ^ Frawley 2003, pp. 61–62
  214. ^ "Trent 800 Technical data (archive)". Rolls-Royce. 2007. Archived from the original on October 26, 2007. Retrieved May 23, 2009. 
Bibliography
  • Abarbanel, Robert; McNeely, William (1996). FlyThru the Boeing 777. New York: ACM SIGGRAPH. ISBN 0-89791-784-7. 
  • Birtles, Philip (1998). Boeing 777, Jetliner for a New Century. St. Paul, Minnesota: Motorbooks International. ISBN 0-7603-0581-1. 
  • Birtles, Philip (1999). Modern Civil Aircraft: 6, Boeing 757/767/777, third edition. London: Ian Allen Publishing. ISBN 0-7110-2665-3. 
  • Eden, Paul, ed. (2008). Civil Aircraft Today: The World's Most Successful Commercial Aircraft. London: Amber Books Ltd. ISBN 1-84509-324-0. 
  • Frawley, Gerard (2003). The International Directory of Civil Aircraft 2003/2004. London: Aerospace Publications. ISBN 1-875671-58-7. 
  • Glenday, Craig (2007). Guinness World Records. London/New York: HiT Entertainment. ISBN 978-0-9735514-4-0. 
  • Newhouse, John (2008). Boeing versus Airbus: The Inside Story of the Greatest International Competition in Business. London: Vintage. ISBN 1-4000-7872-5. 
  • Norris, Guy; Wagner, Mark (1996). Boeing 777. St. Paul, Minnesota: Motorbooks International. ISBN 0-7603-0091-7. 
  • Norris, Guy; Wagner, Mark (2001). Boeing 777: The Technological Marvel. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Zenith Imprint. ISBN 0-7603-0890-X. 
  • Norris, Guy; Wagner, Mark (2009). Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Osceola, Wisconsin: Zenith Press. ISBN 978-0-7603-2815-6. 
  • Norris, Guy; Wagner, Mark (1999). Modern Boeing Jetliners. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Zenith Imprint. ISBN 0-7603-0717-2. 
  • Sabbagh, Karl (1995). 21st Century Jet: The Making of the Boeing 777. New York: Scribner. ISBN 0-333-59803-2. 
  • Wells, Alexander T.; Rodrigues, Clarence C. (2004). Commercial Aviation Safety. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 0-0714-1742-7. 
  • Yenne, Bill (2002). Inside Boeing: Building the 777. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Zenith Press. ISBN 0-7603-1251-6. 

External links