Friday, May 1, 2009

Same-sex marriages in Sweden are officially recognized May 1, :)

Same-sex marriages in Sweden are officially recognized in the country starting from May 1, 2009, following the adoption of a new, gender-neutral law on marriage by the Swedish parliament on April 1, 2009,[1] making Sweden the seventh country in the world to open marriage to same sex couples nationwide. Existing registered partnerships will remain in force, and can be converted to a marriage if the parties so desire, either through a written application or through a formal ceremony.







Background

Registered partnership in Sweden was introduced in 1995. In August 2006, a parliamentary committee described the civil union law as outdated and recommended that the government allow full same-sex marriage. In January 2007, the committee recommended allowing same-sex marriage, with the caveat that individual officials of religious institutions holding a license to perform legally binding marriages should be exempt from performing such marriages if they are against it. In March 2007, the Lutheran Church of Sweden announced that it approves of same-sex marriage.[2] The Church already performs blessings of civil unions. However, the Church will not use the term äktenskap ("marriage") as it believes this word should be reserved for marriage between a man and a woman. A government report published later in March 2007, written by former Chancellor of Justice Hans Regner, proposed that marriage be extended to same-sex couples.[3]

In the Swedish parliament there is an overwhelming majority for legalising same-sex marriages. Only one party of seven says no to legalising same-sex marriages. The parties in the parliament presented in order of size and their opinion of same-sex marriages:

[edit] Vote for the same sex marriage

Party In favour Seats in the Riksdag Position
Social Democratic Party Yes 130 Opposition
Moderate Party Yes 97 Coalition partner in the government
Centre Party Yes 29 Coalition partner in the government
Liberal People's Party Yes 28 Coalition partner in the government
Christian Democrats No 24 Coalition partner in the government
Left Party Yes 22 Opposition
Green Party Yes 19 Opposition
Final Verdict Member of Riksdag
Yes
  • 261
No
  • 22
Abstain
  • 16
Absent
  • 50

The government consists of Moderate Party, Centre Party, Liberal People's Party and the Christian Democrats. The Swedish minister of Justice, Beatrice Ask, who is responsible in the matter, reacted positively when the commission presented its result. The Moderate Party's leader and Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt is a liberal on matters pertaining to LGBT rights, voting for civil unions in 1994 when the mother party said no. How the legalising would end was not clear; one of the coalition partners is against the legalising. The leader of the Social Democratic Party had said that she would put forward a bill in the parliament itself if the government cannot unite in this matter.

In early October 2007, the Green Party, Left Party and Social Democratic Party said they would join forces to introduce an oppostion motion in parliament to legalize same-sex marriage.

On October 27, 2007, the Moderate Party formally backed same-sex marriages, meaning that the Christian Democrats, who are also in the coalition with the governing Moderate Party, would be the only party to oppose the law. Göran Hägglund, who is the leader of the Christian Democrats, stated on Swedish Radio: "My position is that I have been tasked by the party to argue that marriage is for men and women. ... When we discuss it between parties we are naturally open and sensitive to each other's arguments and we'll see if we can find a line that allows us to come together."[4]

On December 12, 2007, the Church of Sweden gave the green light for same-sex couples to wed in the church, but recommended the term "marriage" be restricted to opposite-sex couples. It was asked by the Government for its opinion on the matter before the introduction of legislation in early 2008. "Marriage and (same-sex) partnerships are equivalent forms of unions. Therefore the Church of Sweden's central board says yes to the proposal to join the legislation for marriages and partnerships into a single law," the Church said in a statement. "According to the Church of Sweden's board the word 'marriage' should however only be used for the relationship between a woman and a man," it said.[5]

On January 14, 2008, two leading politicians in the Christian Democrats took a position against the party and started to support same-sex marriage.[6]

Reports suggested the Government would table its same-sex marriage bill in early 2008, however, they had yet to propose a bill as of October 2008. This was likely due to the Christian Democrats' opposition from within the four-party centre-right governing coalition despite their being the only party opposing the move. After negotiations on a compromise broke down and facing a parliamentary ultimatum[7] in late October 2008, the government prepared to present its bill to a free vote; pending its passage, same-sex marriage may be legal in Sweden as of May 1, 2009.[8]

Status of legal recognition in Europe. Same-sex marriage recognized Other type of partnership recognized Unregistered cohabitation recognized Issue under political consideration Unrecognized or unknown Same-sex marriage banned

On 21 January 2009, a bill was introduced in the Swedish parliament to make the legal concept of marriage gender-neutral. The bill was passed on April 1 and took effect on 1 May.[9] The bill was supported by all parties except the Christian Democrats (Kristdemokraterna), a small right-wing party within the governing coalition.[10] It passed with 261 votes in favour, 22 votes against and 16 abstentions.[11]

[edit] Court challenge

On May 12, 2008, media sources reported that a married gay couple from Canada is challenging the Swedish Government in Federal Court, because it refused to recognize their relationship as a marriage.[12] Although a lower court – including the Court of Appeals – refused to hear the case, Sweden's highest court, the Supreme Administrative Court, agreed to accept the challenge. The couple argued that a same-sex marriage entered into in accordance with Canadian law should be recognized in Sweden, despite the fact that there is no legal basis for it under current Swedish law. On December 18, 2008, the Court ruled that the Swedish Tax Authority did not break any rules as the definition of marriage under Swedish law is the union of one man and one woman, and that same-sex relationships are to be recognized as a civil partnership.[13]

[edit] Opinion polls

A poll conducted by Angus Reid Global Monitor regarding European Union integration and attitudes on social issues, found Sweden with the second largest public approval ratings regarding the legalisation of same-sex marriage. It found that 71% of Swedes regard same-sex marriage as a viable option in the near future, and 51% of Swedes approve of adoption for same-sex couples.[14]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

Monday, April 27, 2009

CDC Swine Influenza (Flu) info

Swine Influenza (Flu)

Swine Flu website last updated April 27, 2009 1:00 PM ET

U.S. Human Cases of Swine Flu Infection
(As of April 27, 2009 1:00 PM ET)
State # of laboratory
confirmed cases
California 7 cases
Kansas 2 cases
New York City 28 cases
Ohio 1 case
Texas 2 cases
TOTAL COUNT 40 cases
International Human Cases of Swine Flu Infection
See: World Health OrganizationExternal Web Site Policy.

Human cases of swine influenza A (H1N1) virus infection have been identified in the United States. Human cases of swine influenza A (H1N1) virus infection also have been identified internationally. The current U.S. case count is provided below.

An investigation and response effort surrounding the outbreak of swine flu is ongoing.

CDC is working very closely with officials in states where human cases of swine influenza A (H1N1) have been identified, as well as with health officials in Mexico, Canada and the World Health Organization. This includes deploying staff domestically and internationally to provide guidance and technical support.

CDC activated its Emergency Operations Center to coordinate the agency's response to this emerging health threat and yesterday the Secretary of the Department Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, declared a public health emergency in the United States. This will allow funds to be released to support the public health response. CDC's goals during this public health emergency are to reduce transmission and illness severity, and provide information to assist health care providers, public health officials and the public in addressing the challenges posed by this newly identified influenza virus. To this end, CDC has issued a number of interim guidance documents in the past 24 hours. In addition, CDC's Division of the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) is releasing one-quarter of its antiviral drugs, personal protective equipment, and respiratory protection devices to help states respond to the outbreak. Laboratory testing has found the swine influenza A (H1N1) virus susceptible to the prescription antiviral drugs oseltamivir and zanamivir. This is a rapidly evolving situation and CDC will provide updated guidance and new information as it becomes available.

What You Can Do to Stay Healthy

There are everyday actions people can take to stay healthy.

  • Cover your nose and mouth with a tissue when you cough or sneeze. Throw the tissue in the trash after you use it.
  • Wash your hands often with soap and water, especially after you cough or sneeze. Alcohol-based hands cleaners are also effective.
  • Avoid touching your eyes, nose or mouth. Germs spread that way.

Try to avoid close contact with sick people.

  • Influenza is thought to spread mainly person-to-person through coughing or sneezing of infected people.
  • If you get sick, CDC recommends that you stay home from work or school and limit contact with others to keep from infecting them.
  • Links to non-federal organizations are provided solely as a service to our users. These links do not constitute an endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the federal government, and none should be inferred. CDC is not responsible for the content of the individual organization Web pages found at these links.
Contact Us:
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    1600 Clifton Rd
    Atlanta, GA 30333
  • 800-CDC-INFO
    (800-232-4636)
    TTY: (888) 232-6348
    24 Hours/Every Day
  • cdcinfo@cdc.gov

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Adventures & frustrations with Microsoft Security Response Center

The following was a security inquiry initiated by myself to Microsoft regarding the behaviour of the preview pane in Hotmail. The first part of the entry is my final communication with Microsoft Security Response Center to which they have not bothered to reply to. As you read down, you will also see my earlier security report. A copy of this post is at the Leoville Town Square Information Technology Message Board. The direct post link is:

http://leovilletownsquare.com/fusionbb/showtopic.php?fid/33/tid/26643/pid/180964/post/last/#LAST


.......................................................................................................................................................................

Hotmail reading pane loading security issue‏
From: (msdogfood@hotmail.com)
Sent: April 14, 2009 8:40:28 PM
To: Microsoft Security Response Center (secure@microsoft.com)
Hello

Iam aware that Hotmail does it's own security checks however, my fundamental issue is the reading pane will load one message right after the other into the preview window even when you set it not to. This can be considered a security risk because lets assume the security features of Hotmail don't block everything they are supposed to block. One of the ways you can make sure there is less chance of a security risk getting through is force a user to select the message to activate the preview window. In Outlook 2007 you have this as a standard security setting. Please add this feature to Hotmail or fix the existing setting to work correctly. You are correct in saying most of the time content is automatically blocked as it should be, however, there are times where certain graphics are displayed and certain actions are allowed to happen. If you request an example, I'll have to find one but it won't be too difficult to locate one.

Best regards
msdogfood@hotmail.com


> From: secure@microsoft.com
> To: msdogfood@hotmail.com
> CC: secure@microsoft.com
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:19:50 -0700
> Subject: RE: Hotmail reading pane loading security issue
>
> Hi,
>
> Hotmail does its own security checks before a message is delivered to the mailbox and if not everything in the message is trusted then the system will automatically disable links, pictures, etc. and display a yellow banner asking for you to confirm that the message is safe.
>
> Regards,
> Nate
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:msdogfood@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 7:37 PM
> To: Microsoft Security Response Center
> Subject: Hotmail reading pane loading security issue
>
> Hello
>
> Just to be clear, you do not find it a security issue if the reading pane automatically loads one message after the other after the user selects the first message? I took your suggestion and shut off the reading pane as a test. However, after I manually selected an email, read it and deleted it, the next message automatically loaded itself. I still feel that this is a security risk because if it is a message from a person I don't know and it loads whether I choose it or not, it is an open invitation for any security risk that is not blocked.
>
> You shouldn't always assume that the preview pane will always be able to keep the user safe. As I recall, when you added the preview pane to Microsoft Outlook with the understanding the user would be perfectly safe, you then had to do several years of security patches to plug up the holes hackers got through. Please assure me that even though the pane loads graphics as well as text that your security system will keep my system safe and if not, fix the autoloading bug.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> > From: secure@microsoft.com
> > To: msdogfood@hotmail.com
> > CC: secure@microsoft.com
> > Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:23:02 -0700
> > Subject: RE: Hotmail reading pane loading security issue
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank you for your message regarding features of the Hotmail system. After reviewing your report, this is not something that the MSRC will consider for case. If you are concerned with messages being displayed in the reading pane it is possible to turn the reading pane off by clicking on the options menu and selecting off under reading pane settings.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Nate
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [mailto:msdogfood@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 6:11 PM
> > To: Microsoft Security Response Center
> > Subject: Hotmail reading pane loading security issue
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > This is to report a possible security issue with the Hotmail reading pane.
> >
> > Version information: M3 Hotmail release and up.
> >
> > After I select an unread message that I am suspicious of in the inbox and the reading pane loads the message, I read it in the pane and either choose to delete or mark as spam. After this action, the reading pane automatically loads the next ascending message in the pane without my selecting it, thus loading any content into the viewing window even if it has been deemed dangerous by your own security technology. This will occur even if you set the reading pane to not load any message or take any action until the user selects the message to be opened. I know by design the reading pane is supposed to let you view the message without accessing the message but with it automatically selecting the next message and loading the preview, there is a possibility that an attacker could find a weakness in the blocking methods built into the reading pane.
> >
> > Here is what I would recommend. If a user chooses to select the message for the reading pane, then the next message should not automatically load but be chosen again by the user. The pane should wait for user action. You might also consider removing the reading pane altogether so the user has to choose the message every time. Yes, it is more inconvenient for the user to open a message every time, but it would be easier to control.
> >
> > If you require any further information, please contact me at:
> >
> > msdogfood@hotmail.com
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > Tell the whole story with photos, right from your Messenger window. Learn how!
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Create a cool, new character for your Windows Live(tm) Messenger. Check it out

Tell the whole story with photos, right from your Messenger window. Learn how!






Monday, April 20, 2009

OK what happend to The Canadian Air Carrier Protective Program today on can-jet????


http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/gazette/vol70n3/air-eng.htm


The Canadian Air Carrier Protective Program



Air Canada planeThe Canadian Air Carrier Protective Program (CACPP) evolved in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States. RCMP air marshals — known as Aircraft Protective Officers or, internationally, as In-Flight Security Officers (IFSOs) — started blending in with passengers on all Canadian flights to Washington, D.C., in 2002. They are now tasked to other routes as well.

IFSOs provide a unique protective policing service on board Canadian registered commercial aircraft. These officers are specialized, covert operatives who are strategically deployed to physically intervene in the event that an aircraft becomes at risk of takeover by unauthorized person(s). In addition, IFSOs gather information on any criminal or terrorist activity within the civil aviation environment. For national security reasons, the exact flights and routes protected by the CACPP are carefully guarded secrets. However, the CACPP deploys on a national, transborder and international basis.

In October 2007, RCMP Supt Alphonse MacNeil, the officer in charge of the CACPP, told the Air India Inquiry that the public should take comfort in the fact that RCMP IFSOs are deployed on commercial passenger flights. MacNeil explained that the specialized plainclothes officers are assigned to selected commercial passenger flights according to a threat-risk assessment process.

He said that selected officers train at an undisclosed location, where they can practise scenarios in a commercial aircraft environment. Once the IFSOs have completed this very intensive and highly specialized training, they are assigned to flights according to a “threat matrix.”

When questions arose about whether the presence of armed IFSOs on board commercial passenger flights could pose a risk to the security of jetliners, MacNeil explained that the intense training that Canadian IFSOs receive mitigates that risk. He emphasized that firearms would only be used as a last resort.

“We don’t immediately spring to the use of a firearm,” said MacNeil. “Our people are well trained in . . . the use of hand-to-hand combat and other procedures that are at their disposal. If one of our (IFSOs) is going to engage . . . a firearm, things have deteriorated very, very badly on that flight and they would actually believe that the aircraft is in danger of being taken over or the integrity of the aircraft is in serious risk,” said MacNeil.

The program is necessarily covert to protect the identity of the officers and their operations. However, pilots and flight attendants are informed of the presence of IFSOs. Many measures are in place to protect Canadian airline passengers from terrorist or criminal threats, and the CACPP is a critical layer in the multi-tiered approach to aviation safety and security. IFSOs are the last line of defence in the civil aviation security system.

The CACPP focuses its sights not only on terrorist activity, but also on criminal activity within the airport environment itself. The program houses an effective intelligence program that employs IFSOs in an intelligence-gathering and surveillance capacity. This broad mandate allows observation and analysis performed by the covert operatives to be fed into the RCMP’s greater national intelligence system. Furthermore, the operatives work closely with numerous RCMP sections and partner agencies in the airport environment.

The CACPP has evolved into an integral component of one of the most secure aviation systems in the world. It has been extensively involved in international IFSO programs, and agencies around the globe have requested its expertise. The program has provided complete IFSO training and program development for several foreign countries, with others waiting to receive this specialized training.

At the Air India Inquiry, the inquiry’s Commissioner, John Major, suggested that the general public might feel safer if people knew more about the program. MacNeil agreed, but explained that it is difficult to publicize the program when so many details must remain secret for national security reasons.

Balancing the need to protect the integrity of the program with the need to create public awareness is a challenge that the CACPP is prepared to meet. With a comprehensive package being developed to achieve this goal, the Canadian public will become increasingly aware of this superbly trained tactical unit and the unique protective services it offers for the protection of Canadians and Canadian interests at home and abroad.

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Scandalpedia is no more GRRR!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scandalpedia
candalpedia
is a political website launched September 9, 2008[1] by the Liberal Party of Canada in response to the 2008 Canadian federal election in particular as a counter to an attack website launched by the Conservative Party of Canada [2]. It contains "Wikipedia style" articles on controversial actions and ethical concerns raised since the Conservative Party of Canada has taken power in 2006. It features articles, quotes, and biographies of Conservative party members involved in the various controversies. [3]

The site uses the MediaWiki monobook theme but is not editable by the public and does not appear to be based on MediaWiki software.

References

  1. ^ "Liberals Launch On-Line Conservative “Scandalpedia”", Liberal Party of Canada, 2008-09-09. Retrieved on 2008-09-13.
  2. ^ http://www.eyeweekly.com/blog/features/article/39316
  3. ^ http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/story/2008/09/09/leaders-preview.html?ref=rss

Friday, April 17, 2009

Canada in the British News

British news paper salutes Canada . . . this is a good read. It is funny how it took someone in England to put it into words... Sunday Telegraph Article From today's UK wires:



Salute to a brave and modest nation - Kevin Myers, 'The Sunday Telegraph' LONDON:

Until the deaths of Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan , probably almost no one outside their home country had been aware that Canadian troops are deployed in the region.

And as always, Canada will bury its dead, just as the rest of the world, as always will forget its sacrifice, just as it always forgets nearly everything Canada ever does.. It seems that Canada 's historic mission is to come to the selfless aid both of its friends and of complete strangers, and then, once the crisis is over, to be well and truly ignored.

Canada is the perpetual wallflower that stands on the edge of the hall, waiting for someone to come and ask her for a dance. A fire breaks out, she risks life and limb to rescue her fellow dance-goers, and suffers serious injuries. But when the hall is repaired and the dancing resumes, there is Canada, the wallflower still, while those she once helped Glamorously cavort across the floor, blithely neglecting her yet again.

That is the price Canada pays for sharing the North American continent with the United States , and for being a selfless friend of Britain in two global conflicts.

For much of the 20th century, Canada was torn in two different directions: It seemed to be a part of the old world, yet had an address in the new one, and that divided identity ensured that it never fully got the gratitude it deserved.

Yet it's purely voluntary contribution to the cause of freedom in two world wars was perhaps the greatest of any democracy. Almost 10% of Canada 's entire population of seven million people served in the armed forces during the First World War, and nearly 60,000 died. The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle.

Canada was repaid for its enormous sacrifice by downright neglect, it's unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular Memory as somehow or other the work of the 'British.'

The Second World War provided a re-run. The Canadian navy began the war with a half dozen vessels, and ended up policing nearly half of the Atlantic against U-boat attack. More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000 Canadian soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone.

Canada finished the war with the third-largest navy and the fourth largest air force in the world. The world thanked Canada with the same sublime indifference as it had the previous time.

Canadian participation in the war was acknowled ged in film only if it was necessary to give an American actor a part in a campaign in which the United States had clearly not participated - a touching scrupulousness which, of course, Hollywood has since abandoned, as if it has any notion of a separate Canadian identity.

So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in Hollywood keep their nationality - unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg, Alex Trebek, Art Linkletter and Dan Aykroyd have in the popular perception become American, and Christopher Plummer, British.

It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers.

Moreover, Canada is every bit as querulously alert to the achievements of its sons and daughters as the rest of the world is completely unaware of them. The Canadians proudly say of themselves - and are unheard by anyone else - that 1% of the world's population has provided 10% of the world's peacekeeping forces.

Canadian soldiers in the past half century have been the greatest peacekeepers on Earth - in 39 missions on UN mandates, and six on non-UN peacekeeping duties, from Vietnam to East Timor, from Sinai to Bosnia.

Yet the only foreign engagement that has entered the popular non-Canadian imagination was the sorry affair in Somalia , in which out-of-control paratroopers murdered two Somali infiltrators. Their regiment was then disbanded in disgrace - a uniquely Canadian act of self-abasement for which, naturally, the Canadians received no international credit.

So who today in the United States knows about the stoic and selfless friendship its northern neighbour has given it in Afghanistan ?

Rather like Cyrano de Bergerac , Canada repeatedly does honourable things for honourable motives, but instead of being thanked for it, it remains something of a figure of fun. It is the Canadian way, for which Canadians should be proud, yet such honour comes at a high cost. This past year more grieving Canadian families knew that cost all too tragically well.

Lest we forget.


Kevin Myers, 'The Sunday Telegraph' LONDON:

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Death of female Cdn shocks relative who wants troops out of Afghanistan

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090414/national/afghan_cda_soldier_reaction


MONTREAL - The godfather of a young female soldier killed in Afghanistan just two weeks into her first deployment fears the young woman's sacrifice was in vain.

Echoing the sentiment of many Quebecers, who have consistently been among the most vocal opponents of the controversial mission, Mario Blais said it's time for Ottawa to pull Canadian troops out.

"I think she did this for absolutely nothing," Blais said during a telephone interview.

"The Russians were in Afghanistan for many years and they couldn't push them back. I ask myself what Canada is doing. We were blue berets, now we're fighters."

Blais made the comments after learning his 21-year-old goddaughter, Karine Blais, had been killed Monday by a roadside bomb north of Kandahar City.

She is the second female Canadian soldier to die in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.

Blais said Prime Minister Stephen Harper should "get the troops out of there as fast as possible" and that the Canadian military should return to its peacekeeping roots.

"I'm worried for all those who are there," he said of the latest rotation comprised largely of Quebecers based out of CFB Valcartier.

"I don't think it's our place at all, at all, at all. We should be leading peacekeeping missions, not combat missions like we're doing."

Blais said news of Karine's death came as a "shock" to her many friends and relatives who are now grieving in her home town of Les Mechins in eastern Quebec.

"This is a hard blow for the family," he said, adding nobody was particularly thrilled when she decided to take up a career in the military.

He said she didn't talk much about the mission before she deployed, perhaps so as not to upset them or perhaps because she didn't realize how bad it would be.

A statement released by her family Tuesday said she often asked her mother if she was proud of her.

"To answer your question, yes, we are always proud of you, despite the sadness that has enveloped us," the statement said.

"In our eyes, you were a soldier who displayed dynamic leadership and who was dedicated to your regiment. You loved your job in the military and you were very proud of yourself...

"You are our ray of sunshine and you will always be in our hearts. Your sense of humour and your vivacity will remain forever in our memories."

Blais described his goddaughter as a very social girl who grew up working at the local convenience store.

He said she enjoyed adventure and signed up for the army a few years ago when recruiters stopped by her school.

He believes she hoped the army would help her learn a trade that she could then apply outside of the military.

At gatherings during the Christmas holidays, relatives begged her to take up an administrative position, but she'd already signed up for a role on the front lines as a truck driver.

Blais said she was living with a man who is also in the army and that the two planned to buy a house.

Karine is survived by her father Gino Blais, her mother Josee Simard and her younger brother Billy.

Her death came a day before Tuesday's ceremony where the Royal 22nd Regiment, in which Blais was serving, took the reins from the 3rd Royal Canadian Regiment of Petawawa, Ont., as the primary battle group in southern Afghanistan.

Brig.-Gen. Jonathan Vance, the commander of Canadian troops in Afghanistan, praised Blais earlier in the day for her enthusiasm for the mission.

"She was an energetic soldier who gave 100 per cent to every challenge she faced using a unique sense of humour, based on her honesty," he said. "Frank and direct, she demonstrated the qualities of a future leader who was respected by all members of her squadron."

"This young woman's life did not go to waste; she believed in her role in Afghanistan and her dedication to the overall mission is beyond commendable."

Quebec Premier Jean Charest released a statement offering his condolences to the young woman's family, friends and comrades.

"These sad incidents remind us of the courage and determination our women and men who go to Afghanistan have as they don't hesitate to put their lives in danger in order to accomplish the mission for which they were entrusted," he said.

"I want to remind all of those in the military that their commitment commands our respect and admiration."

By late afternoon Tuesday, more than 80 people had added their names to a Facebook page launched in her honour.

In a posting by her cousin Sarah Harrisson, Karine was described as an "extraordinary" sister to Billy.

"I'm in shock," she wrote. "It's a big loss. A fighter who chose a risky job, my beautiful cousin, you will always be in our hearts."

Katheleen Carrier, another of her cousins, called Karine the "pride of the entire family."

"Our little fighting soldier, I'm proud of you," she wrote. "We all are.

"I will always remember your beautiful smile, your unique laugh, your sense of humour and everything you were. Rest in peace soldier Blais."

Marc Carignan, a fellow soldier based in Edmonton, said he remembers Karine from a course they took together in Saint-Jean.

"I will always remember her smile, her sense of humour and her wonderful accent," he said.

"My sympathies to her family. Courage."