Criticism and controversy
Ford and fellow councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, who occupies a neighbouring ward, have often scrapped with each other and these exchanges have made headlines in local newspapers.[16] Controversy erupted when several councillors reportedly heard Ford call Mammoliti "Gino boy" in the debate over the 2002 budget.[17] Mammoliti filed a complaint for the ethnic slur.[18] Mammoliti's son Michael filed his papers to run against Ford in the 2003 municipal election, but withdrew at the last moment.[19] In March 2003, in a debate over the budget of the Toronto Zoo, Ford called Mammoliti, who chairs the zoo board, a "snake" and a "weasel" in council.[20][21] In September 2010, Mammoliti endorsed Ford for Mayor.[22]
In 2002, Ford strenuously objected to the possibility that a homeless shelter would open in his suburban Etobicoke ward.[23][24] Later in the same year, he was quoted while berating an anti-poverty activist, "Do you have a job, sir? I'll give you a newspaper to find a job, like everyone else has to do between 9 and 5."[25] In 2005, Ford told a homeless protestor, "I'm working. Why don't you get a job?"[26]
In 2006, allegations arose of his conduct at a Toronto Maple Leafs game. Two audience members alleged Ford instigated a shouting match.[27] Security at the Air Canada Centre later ejected Ford from the venue. Initially, Ford denied involvement, claiming mistaken identity. The following day, Ford confirmed the allegations and announced his apology to the couple.[28] He cited "personal problems" as a reason for his behaviour.
Further controversy erupted in a Toronto City Council session when Ford argued against the city spending $1.5 million on AIDS prevention programs. Ford stated that "(AIDS) is very preventable," and that "if you are not doing needles and you are not gay, you wouldn't get AIDS probably, that's bottom line."[29] With respect to the increasing rates of women contracting the disease, Ford said; "How are women getting it? Maybe they are sleeping with bisexual men."[29]
Again sparking controversy in March 2008, during a debate at City Hall, Ford said, "Those Oriental people work like dogs. They work their hearts out ... that's why they're successful in life. ... I'm telling you, Oriental people, they're slowly taking over, because there's no excuses for them. They're hard, hard workers." He drew criticism for those remarks from Mayor David Miller, budget chief Shelley Carroll and other councillors.[30][31]
In 1999, Ford was arrested in Miami for driving under the influence (DUI) and marijuana possession charges.[32] According to the statement recorded by the arresting officer, Ford was acting nervous, had blood shot eyes and had "a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage on his breath". Ford threw his hands up in the air and told the police officer, "Go ahead, take me to jail."[33] Until he was questioned by reporters,[34] Ford said that the marijuana charge had "completely, totally slipped my mind" because the more serious issue during that arrest was the DUI charge.[35] Ford initially denied the DUI charge, claiming instead he was arrested because he "refused to give a breath sample".[36]
Ford garnered controversy again in August 2010 after endorsing Pastor Wendell Brereton, who is running for city councillor in Ward 6. Pastor Brereton has suggested online that same-sex marriage could “dismantle” a “healthy democratic civilization.” Ford has said in regards to Pastor Brereton that “We’re together. We have the same thoughts." Ford also has noted that he supports traditional marriage, preferring that model to same-sex marriage. "I always have," he stated. "But if people want to, to each their own. I’m not worried about what people do in their private life. I look out for taxpayers’ money."[37][38]
References
1.^ a b "Toronto city councillors, Rob Ford". City of Toronto, Accessing City Hall. 2007. http://www.toronto.ca/councillors/ford1.htm. Retrieved 2007-04-26.
2.^ Diebel, Linda. Rob Ford’s complicated life. The Toronto Star. April 23, 2010.
3.^ Grossman, David (2009-09-13). "Rob Ford a team player to schools". Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/article/694944.
4.^ "10 Worst Councillors". NOW Magazine. 2003-07-03. http://www.nowtoronto.com/news/story.cfm?content=138963&archive=23,9,2003.
5.^ Bilton, Chris (2010-07-07). "Beware the unmuzzled Rob Ford". Eye Weekly. http://www.eyeweekly.com/city/mayoral%20race%202010/article/96612.
6.^ "Councillor Blames Politicians' Perks For Your Tax Hike". City News. 2007-04-24. http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_10235.aspx.
7.^ a b Vincent, Donovan (2007-03-19). "Who are big spenders at city hall?". Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/News/article/193484.
8.^ Griffiths, Jeff (2007-11-08). "Councillors Office Expenses – Councillor Ford and Councillor Holyday". http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2007/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-8804.pdf.
9.^ Vincent, Donovan (2007-11-27). "Reveal expenses, Ford told". The Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/News/article/280116.
10.^ Byers, Jim; Maloney, Paul (2007-03-08). "City decays as debt climbs". Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/News/article/189595. Retrieved 2007-04-26. "I can't support bike lanes..."
11.^ "Recording of Toronto council session during which Rob Ford comments on cyclists". 2010-08-03. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nySs1cEq5rs. Retrieved 2010-09-24.
12.^ Hume, Christopher (May 26, 2009). "One small lane for mankind". The Star (Toronto). http://www.thestar.com/gta/columnist/article/640318. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
13.^ Grant, Kelly (2010-05-08). "Reprimand Ford for confidentiality breach, integrity commissioner says". Globe and Mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/reprimand-ford-for-confidentiality-breach-integrity-commissioner-says/article1559703/. Retrieved 2010-05-08.
14.^ "Ottawa's attempt to tax councillors' perks, expense budgets rejected by city". http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/ottawas-attempt-to-tax-councillors-perks-expense-budgets-rejected-by-city/article1486325/.
15.^ Rider, David (2010-04-30). "Councillors ordered to return free transit passes". Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/torontocouncil/article/803247.
16.^ Cowan, James. Ford is known for his outbursts. National Post. February 28, 2003 p. A11
17.^ Wanagas, Don. "Sorry, Wrong Number". Toronto NOW online edition. http://www.nowtoronto.com/news/story.cfm?content=135655. Retrieved 2007-04-26. "...hardcore Conservative Ford allegedly called neo-Liberal Mammoliti a 'Gino boy'..."
18.^ Lu, Vanessa. City hall verbal scuffle is over. Toronto Star, 15 April 2003, p. B02 The city spent $30,000 investigating Mammoliti's complaint.
19.^ No Byline. Ford hopes new team has 'right' stuff. The Toronto Star. October 13, 2003, p. B02
20.^ No Byline. Childish behaviour. Toronto Star. March 1, 2003, p.E06
21.^ "Recording of March 2003 council session". 2010-09-21. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOi2wIUCTnA. Retrieved 2010-09-24.
22.^ ". Mammoliti endorses Ford for mayor". 2010-09-22. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2010/09/22/ford-mammoliti.html. Retrieved 2010-10-01.
23.^ "Not in My Ward". Toronto NOW online edition. http://www.nowtoronto.com/print.cfm?content=131954. Retrieved 2007-04-26. "This is an insult to my constituents to even think about having a homeless shelter in their ward..."
24.^ "Recording of Toronto council session during which Rob Ford comments on preferring a "public lynching" to having a public meeting to discuss a homeless shelter in his ward". 2010-08-09. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YZQ4oQjxgc. Retrieved 2010-09-25.
25.^ Moloney, Paul. Councillors to activists: Get a job --- Noisy expulsion follows protest over housing sale. Toronto Star. October 30, 2002, p. B04
26.^ Porter, Catherine. Protestors storm council; OCAP denounces homeless plan Clarke shouts, Miller leaves. Toronto Star February 2, 2005 p. B03
27.^ James, Royson. Ford can forget his mayoral dreams. He was on private time, Ford says. Toronto Star. May 3, 2006. B05. Ford's statements include, "You right-wing communist bastards," and "My sister was a heroin addict and was shot in the head."
28.^ "Ford admits lying to media about drunken outburst". CBC News, Toronto. 2006-05-03. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2006/05/03/tor-ford060503.html. Retrieved 2007-04-26. "I reflected on it last night, and talked to my family. I came forward and admitted (that I lied to the media about not being at the game). That's all I can do. I mean, I'm not perfect"
29.^ a b "Councillor Rob Ford Under Fire Over AIDS Comments". CHUM Television, CityNews, Toronto. 2006-06-29. http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_1632.aspx. Retrieved 2007-04-26.
30.^ Lu, Vanessa (2008-03-06). "Ford rebuked for Asian comments". Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/article/310088. Retrieved 2008-03-06.
31.^ Gray, Jeff (2008-03-06). "Ford draws rebuke, saying Oriental people are taking over". The Globe and Mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080306.COUNCILBOX06/TPStory/TPNational/Ontario/. Retrieved 2008-03-06.
32.^ Dempsey, Amy (2010-08-19). "‘Go ahead take me to jail,’ Ford told police". Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/849744--go-ahead-take-me-to-jail-ford-told-police?bn=1/. Retrieved 2010-08-19.
33.^ http://www.scribd.com/doc/36132032/Rob-Ford-Arrest-Report
34.^ Jenkins, Jonathan (2010-08-18). "Ford dodges pot bust in Florida". Toronto Sun. http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontoandgta/2010/08/18/15067206.html. Retrieved 2010-08-19.
35.^ Grant, Kelly (2010-08-19). "Ford forgot marijuana charge, confuses impaired driving charge". Globe and Mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/ford-forgot-marijuana-charge-remembers-breath-test-guilty-plea/article1678316/. Retrieved 2010-08-19.
36.^ Lamberti, Rob (2010-08-19). "'Go ahead, take me to jail': Ford during 1999 arrest". Toronto Sun. http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontoandgta/2010/08/19/15075241.html. Retrieved 2010-08-19.
37.^ Grant, Kelly (2010-08-05). "‘Ford’s endorsement of pastor for council stokes fear among gays’". Globe and Mail. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/rob-ford-accepts-christian-pastors-endorsement-wavers-on-gay-marriage/article1661703/. Retrieved 2010-09-25.
38.^ Alcoba, Natalie (2010-08-04). "‘Fundamentalist pastor drops out of mayoral race, endorses Rob Ford’". National Post. http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/08/04/fundamentalist-pastor-drops-out-of-mayoral-race-endorses-rob-ford/. Retrieved 2010-09-25.
39.^ a b David Rider. Rob Ford kicks off mayoral campaign. Toronto Star. March 26, 2010. [1]
40.^ Royson James. Rob Ford proves popular at mayoral campaign launch. Toronto Star March 29, 2010.[2]
41.^ David Rider. Rob Ford's bid for mayor will tilt campaign to the right. Toronto Star. March 22, 2010 [3]
42.^ Rider, David (2010-05-06). "Ford punishes campaign worker for Twitter message". Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/torontomayoralrace/article/805559.
43.^ Alcoba, Natalie (2010-08-17). "Computer inside Toronto Star company edited Rob Ford’s Wikipedia entry". National Post. http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/08/17/computer-inside-toronto-star-company-edited-rob-fords-wikipedia-entry/#ixzz0wtENyrKc.
44.^ "Yours vaguely, Rob Ford". Toronto Star. 2010-08-26. http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/torontomayoralrace/article/853234. Retrieved 2010-08-31.
45.^ "Rob Ford issues “vague” policy response: Toronto mayoral frontrunner slips up yet again". Macleans. 2010-08-27. http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/08/27/rob-ford-issues-%E2%80%9Cvague%E2%80%9D-policy-response/. Retrieved 2010-09-04.
46.^ Ford sued for $6 million by Boardwalk Pub owner Toronto Star. October 12, 2010.
47.^ "Rob Ford opens huge lead in mayor’s race.". Toronto Star. 2010-09-19. http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/torontomayoralrace/article/863462--rob-ford-opens-huge-lead-in-mayor-s-race?bn=1.
48.^ "Ford holds commanding lead in Toronto Mayoral race". Nanos Research. 2010-09-21. http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-W10-T433.pdf.
49.^ "Frontrunner Rob Ford losing steam in Toronto mayoral race: poll". The Globe and Mail. 2010-09-28. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/city-votes/frontrunner-rob-ford-losing-steam-in-toronto-mayoral-race-poll/article1729126/?cmpid=rss1. Retrieved 2010-09-28.
50.^ "Contest grows tighter as Thomson drops out, endorses Smitherman". The Globe and Mail. 2010-09-29. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/city-votes/contest-grows-tighter-as-thomson-drops-out-endorses-smitherman/article1731621/. Retrieved 2010-09-29.
External links
Rob Ford profile on City of Toronto website
Rob Ford's personal website
Rob Ford for Mayor
Rob Ford Condemning Councillors' "free perks"
Rob Ford's 2010 Council Expenses
Ford fest was fun in Eye Weekly
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Valedictorian slams MP Vic Toews I love it!!.
It was a valedictorian speech the University of Winnipeg and MP Vic Toews will never forget.
With Toews sitting a few feet from the podium, Erin Larson scolded the university for giving the Conservative MP an honorary law degree.
“The decision to give an honorary law degree to someone who is best known amongst my generation of students as being a vocal opponent to the expansion of human rights, is questionable at best.” said Larson.
Upon leaving the stage, Larson did not make eye contact with a clapping Toews, who referenced her remarks during his address. He said he was humbled to receive the award but hoped his modesty was not a sign to some he should not receive the honour.
“It appears that there are already a few who have asked that question today,” said Toews
U of W President Lloyd Axworthy later condemned the comments as inappropriate.
With Toews sitting a few feet from the podium, Erin Larson scolded the university for giving the Conservative MP an honorary law degree.
“The decision to give an honorary law degree to someone who is best known amongst my generation of students as being a vocal opponent to the expansion of human rights, is questionable at best.” said Larson.
Upon leaving the stage, Larson did not make eye contact with a clapping Toews, who referenced her remarks during his address. He said he was humbled to receive the award but hoped his modesty was not a sign to some he should not receive the honour.
“It appears that there are already a few who have asked that question today,” said Toews
U of W President Lloyd Axworthy later condemned the comments as inappropriate.
Monday, October 18, 2010
Toronto Police Service Controversies and allegations of misconduct
Controversies and allegations of misconduct
A mandatory Coroner's Inquest took place into the police killing of 17-year-old Jeffrey Reodica. Although accounts differ, it is generally accepted that Reodica was part of a group of Filipino teenagers pursuing a group of white teenagers on May 21, 2004, following altercations between the two groups. Plainclothes Toronto police officer Det.-Const. Dan Belanger and his partner Det. Allen Love were in the process of arresting Reodica when he was shot by the officers, the teen died in hospital three days later. Belanger and his partner, Det. Allen Love, were eventually cleared by the Special Investigations Unit (SIU) who accepted their story that Reodica lunged at them with a knife.[8]
In response to the recommendations of the Coroner's Inquest jury, Chief Blair recommended that all plainclothes police officers be issued arm bands and raid jackets bearing the word 'Police' in an effort to increase their visibility in critical situations. Unmarked cars, which are already equipped with a plug-in police light, will also be supplied with additional emergency equipment, including a siren package. The proposals will be phased in over three years beginning in 2008. Undercover officers will also have to wear, carry or have access to standard police use-of-force options such as pepper spray and batons.[9][10]
In 2004, eight people were shot by Toronto Police, and six of them died from their wounds. The Special Investigations Unit (SIU) investigated each shooting, but found all of them to be justified.
In 2005, the police force was faced with a spike in shootings across Toronto and increased concern among residents. Police Chief William Blair and Mayor David Miller asked for additional resources and asked for diligence from residents to contend with this issue. Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty promised to work with Toronto to fight crime.
In July 2007, Toronto Police were involved in an international incident in which their members pepper-sprayed, tasered, and handcuffed members of the Chilean national soccer team in an attempt to keep control of crowds after their semi-final match in the 2007 FIFA Under-20 World Cup. A police spokesman explained on CBC Radio on the programme Here and Now that police took action against individual members of the Chilean team when they "displayed aggressive behaviour" by vandalizing a bus and arguing with fans. The actions of the police were criticised by the TV and print media in Chile,[11][12] and initially also in Canada, but following a news conference and more detailed description of behaviour by the Chilean team the criticism (outside of Chile) was withdrawn. FIFA president Sepp Blatter later apologized to the Toronto mayor for the incident, and instigated disciplinary action against the officials and players of the Chilean team.[13]
References
1.^ http://voiceoftoronto.com/wp/2010/02/toronto%E2%80%99s-balanced-budget-protects-city-services-supports-residents-and-business/ Policing costs skyrocketing
2.^ http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph3.htm Toronto Police in 1834 - 1860 "Formidable Engines of Oppression"
3.^ a b http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph4.htm Toronto Police in the 1850s The Gangs of Toronto and the Call For Reform
4.^ http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph3.htm Toronto Police 1834 - 1860 "Formidable Engines of Oppression"
5.^ http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph5.htm Toronto Police in 1859 -1875 The Militarization of the Constables
6.^ http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph5a.htm Military-Intelligence Functions of the Toronto Police During the U.S. Civil War Era and the Fenian Threat
7.^ http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph6.htm History of the Toronto Police Part 4: 1875 - 1920
8.^ Police killed unarmed teen, family says
9.^ Jeffrey Michael Reodica Inquest Jury Recommendations, Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario
10.^ Toronto Police Services Board, Minutes of the Meeting of April 26, 2007, pages 85-90
11.^ Chilean soccer team involved in melee with police
12.^ La Nacion.cl
13.^ FIFA vows action after U-20 brawl
14.^ http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/communications/selection.php
15.^ "Reasons for Selection, 2009 Greater Toronto's Top Employers Competition". http://www.eluta.ca/top-employer-toronto-police-service.
16.^ [1]
17.^ Swainson, Gail (January 16, 2009). "Toronto police duo saddles up for Obama". Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/news/world/uselection/article/572006--toronto-police-duo-saddles-up-for-obama. Retrieved 2009-01-16.
External links
Toronto Police Official Site
Toronto Police Services Board
History of Policing In Toronto
Toronto Police History
Toronto Police history 2
22 Division Toronto Police Service Rovers
Inquest into Jeffrey Reodica shooting begins
A mandatory Coroner's Inquest took place into the police killing of 17-year-old Jeffrey Reodica. Although accounts differ, it is generally accepted that Reodica was part of a group of Filipino teenagers pursuing a group of white teenagers on May 21, 2004, following altercations between the two groups. Plainclothes Toronto police officer Det.-Const. Dan Belanger and his partner Det. Allen Love were in the process of arresting Reodica when he was shot by the officers, the teen died in hospital three days later. Belanger and his partner, Det. Allen Love, were eventually cleared by the Special Investigations Unit (SIU) who accepted their story that Reodica lunged at them with a knife.[8]
In response to the recommendations of the Coroner's Inquest jury, Chief Blair recommended that all plainclothes police officers be issued arm bands and raid jackets bearing the word 'Police' in an effort to increase their visibility in critical situations. Unmarked cars, which are already equipped with a plug-in police light, will also be supplied with additional emergency equipment, including a siren package. The proposals will be phased in over three years beginning in 2008. Undercover officers will also have to wear, carry or have access to standard police use-of-force options such as pepper spray and batons.[9][10]
In 2004, eight people were shot by Toronto Police, and six of them died from their wounds. The Special Investigations Unit (SIU) investigated each shooting, but found all of them to be justified.
In 2005, the police force was faced with a spike in shootings across Toronto and increased concern among residents. Police Chief William Blair and Mayor David Miller asked for additional resources and asked for diligence from residents to contend with this issue. Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty promised to work with Toronto to fight crime.
In July 2007, Toronto Police were involved in an international incident in which their members pepper-sprayed, tasered, and handcuffed members of the Chilean national soccer team in an attempt to keep control of crowds after their semi-final match in the 2007 FIFA Under-20 World Cup. A police spokesman explained on CBC Radio on the programme Here and Now that police took action against individual members of the Chilean team when they "displayed aggressive behaviour" by vandalizing a bus and arguing with fans. The actions of the police were criticised by the TV and print media in Chile,[11][12] and initially also in Canada, but following a news conference and more detailed description of behaviour by the Chilean team the criticism (outside of Chile) was withdrawn. FIFA president Sepp Blatter later apologized to the Toronto mayor for the incident, and instigated disciplinary action against the officials and players of the Chilean team.[13]
References
1.^ http://voiceoftoronto.com/wp/2010/02/toronto%E2%80%99s-balanced-budget-protects-city-services-supports-residents-and-business/ Policing costs skyrocketing
2.^ http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph3.htm Toronto Police in 1834 - 1860 "Formidable Engines of Oppression"
3.^ a b http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph4.htm Toronto Police in the 1850s The Gangs of Toronto and the Call For Reform
4.^ http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph3.htm Toronto Police 1834 - 1860 "Formidable Engines of Oppression"
5.^ http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph5.htm Toronto Police in 1859 -1875 The Militarization of the Constables
6.^ http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph5a.htm Military-Intelligence Functions of the Toronto Police During the U.S. Civil War Era and the Fenian Threat
7.^ http://www.russianbooks.org/crime/cph6.htm History of the Toronto Police Part 4: 1875 - 1920
8.^ Police killed unarmed teen, family says
9.^ Jeffrey Michael Reodica Inquest Jury Recommendations, Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario
10.^ Toronto Police Services Board, Minutes of the Meeting of April 26, 2007, pages 85-90
11.^ Chilean soccer team involved in melee with police
12.^ La Nacion.cl
13.^ FIFA vows action after U-20 brawl
14.^ http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/communications/selection.php
15.^ "Reasons for Selection, 2009 Greater Toronto's Top Employers Competition". http://www.eluta.ca/top-employer-toronto-police-service.
16.^ [1]
17.^ Swainson, Gail (January 16, 2009). "Toronto police duo saddles up for Obama". Toronto Star. http://www.thestar.com/news/world/uselection/article/572006--toronto-police-duo-saddles-up-for-obama. Retrieved 2009-01-16.
External links
Toronto Police Official Site
Toronto Police Services Board
History of Policing In Toronto
Toronto Police History
Toronto Police history 2
22 Division Toronto Police Service Rovers
Inquest into Jeffrey Reodica shooting begins
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Bombardier Aerospace bets on big new business jets.
Bombardier Aerospace is adding two large business jets to its Global series of aircraft — one capable of carrying eight passengers non-stop to New York from Mumbai, India, the other boasting what the company says will be the largest cabin in its class.
The Global 7000 and Global 8000, featuring new wing designs and new General Electric engines, will join the Global 5000 and Global Express XRS in the lineup Bombardier introduced in 1996, the Montreal-based plane maker said Saturday.
"By extending this great aircraft family, we are once again offering a business jet travel experience that is unmatched and ahead of its time," said Steve Ridolfi, president of Bombardier Business Aircraft.
The Global 7000 is to enter service in 2016, with a cabin designed for 10 passengers that the company said will be 20 per cent bigger than the current industry leader, and a non-stop range of 13,500 kilometres. The Global 8000, to follow in 2017, will have a range of 14,600 kilometres, "farther than any other business jet," Ridolfi said.
Both planes are to have a top cruising speed of just over 900 km/h.
The new wing design will "significantly optimize aerodynamic efficiency," Bombardier said, while next-generation GE TechX 16,500-pound-thrust engines will provide fuel-economy and emissions improvements.
Other features will include windows 80-per-cent larger than on current Global aircraft, a baggage hold accessible during flight, a lie-down crew rest area and a sizable galley.
Bombardier did not provide an estimate of the cost of developing the Global 7000 and 8000 or indicate prices for the aircraft.
It noted that the specifications are approximate, as the program "is currently in the development phase and as such is subject to changes in family strategy, branding, capacity, performance, design and/or systems."
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2010/10/16/bombardier-business-jets.html#socialcomments#ixzz12ahHrJ2Y
The Global 7000 and Global 8000, featuring new wing designs and new General Electric engines, will join the Global 5000 and Global Express XRS in the lineup Bombardier introduced in 1996, the Montreal-based plane maker said Saturday.
"By extending this great aircraft family, we are once again offering a business jet travel experience that is unmatched and ahead of its time," said Steve Ridolfi, president of Bombardier Business Aircraft.
The Global 7000 is to enter service in 2016, with a cabin designed for 10 passengers that the company said will be 20 per cent bigger than the current industry leader, and a non-stop range of 13,500 kilometres. The Global 8000, to follow in 2017, will have a range of 14,600 kilometres, "farther than any other business jet," Ridolfi said.
Both planes are to have a top cruising speed of just over 900 km/h.
The new wing design will "significantly optimize aerodynamic efficiency," Bombardier said, while next-generation GE TechX 16,500-pound-thrust engines will provide fuel-economy and emissions improvements.
Other features will include windows 80-per-cent larger than on current Global aircraft, a baggage hold accessible during flight, a lie-down crew rest area and a sizable galley.
Bombardier did not provide an estimate of the cost of developing the Global 7000 and 8000 or indicate prices for the aircraft.
It noted that the specifications are approximate, as the program "is currently in the development phase and as such is subject to changes in family strategy, branding, capacity, performance, design and/or systems."
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2010/10/16/bombardier-business-jets.html#socialcomments#ixzz12ahHrJ2Y
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Canada not ready for shale gas boom : Will Canada’s Water be Protected in the Rush to Develop Shale Gas?
Canada’s fledgling shale gas industry faces a growing clamour for tighter regulations and greater protection of local water sources amid fears that aggressive drilling techniques carry a heavy environmental cost.
The enormous potential of shale gas resources is considered a “game changer” in the North American energy landscape, promising large supplies of relatively low-cost fuel for decades. But the industry is encountering stiff opposition in Quebec, New York state and other jurisdictions where residents and environmentalists worry that drilling techniques using chemical-laced water, a process known as fracking, pose a threat to drinking water and wildlife.
. .
Will Canada’s Water be Protected in the Rush to Develop Shale Gas?
As Quebec holds raucous and divisive hearings over the future of its promising shale industry, a new study to be published Thursday by the University of Toronto argues that Canadian regulators are wholly unprepared for the shale gas boom that is sweeping North America.
“To date, Canada has not developed adequate regulations or public policy to address the scale or cumulative impact of hydraulic fracking on water resources,” says the report by Ben Parfitt, a Victoria-based researcher whose work was commissioned by the water program at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs.
Mr. Parfitt said the federal government is virtually absent from the discussion, while provinces issue oil companies with individual water-use permits despite having little understanding of the cumulative impacts of increasing drilling activity, no public reporting on the chemicals or amount of industrial water withdrawals and no systematic mapping of the country’s aquifers.
Without a more robust regulatory approach, “rapid shale gas development could potentially threaten important water resources, if not fracture the country’s water security,” Mr. Parfitt wrote in the study, which will be formally released Thursday at a day-long Munk School conference.
The international oil industry is investing heavily in North America shale plays. Just last weekend, Calgary-based Talisman Energy Inc. (TLM-T17.99-0.19-1.05%) announced it is teaming up with Norway’s Statoil ASA for a $1.3-billion (U.S.) acquisition of properties in Texas’ Eagle Ford shale. As well, China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC) said it is investing $1-billion for a one-third stake in Chesapeake Energy Corp.’s Eagle Ford play.
In Canada, companies like Talisman, Encana Corp., (ECA-T30.58-0.10-0.33%) and U.S-based Apache Corp. are planning massive investment in northeastern B.C. and western Alberta, notably in the prolific Horn River and Montney plays. Companies are also eager to develop Quebec’s Utica shale zone and in New Brunswick. As well, the industry is applying the drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques to other oil and unconventional gas fields in Alberta and Saskatchewan – using high-pressured, chemically-treated water to break open tight formations and release the trapped hydrocarbons.
The industry acknowledges that massive expansion of shale development through hydraulic fracturing could threaten water supplies if not properly done, but insist that provincial regulators and the companies themselves are prepared to meet the challenge through water recycling, and tapping salt-water aquifers.
In northeastern B.C., “there is a realization the full-blown development in some of these shale regions is going to tax the water availability if we go forward with a traditional, business-as-usual approach to how water is used,” said Kevin Heffernan, vice-president of Calgary-based Canadian Society for Unconventional Gas, a industry-backed association.
“And certainly the industry is very, very aware that shale-gas development is water intensive and is working hard to find approaches that are going to make sense for the long term,” Mr. Heffernan said in an interview.
But Mr. Parfitt suggests the industry – with the blessing of the B.C. regulator – is forging ahead with development plans in British Columbia and elsewhere while key questions remain unanswered.
While the industry claims there is no evidence that hydraulic fracturing has contaminated aquifers, the researcher cited a number of cases in the United States where ground water was tainted during nearby drilling activity. And there is no requirement in Canada for companies to disclose what chemicals they use in fracturing – as there is in several states.
As well, there has been no assessment in B.C. – or other provinces – of how the industry will be able to dispose of massive amounts of waste water that is produced during the drilling, a key concern regarding possible surface water contamination.
“The pace of the shale gas revolution demands greater scrutiny before more fracture lines appear across the country,” he said.
Learn more in our Investor Learning Centre
The enormous potential of shale gas resources is considered a “game changer” in the North American energy landscape, promising large supplies of relatively low-cost fuel for decades. But the industry is encountering stiff opposition in Quebec, New York state and other jurisdictions where residents and environmentalists worry that drilling techniques using chemical-laced water, a process known as fracking, pose a threat to drinking water and wildlife.
. .
Will Canada’s Water be Protected in the Rush to Develop Shale Gas?
As Quebec holds raucous and divisive hearings over the future of its promising shale industry, a new study to be published Thursday by the University of Toronto argues that Canadian regulators are wholly unprepared for the shale gas boom that is sweeping North America.
“To date, Canada has not developed adequate regulations or public policy to address the scale or cumulative impact of hydraulic fracking on water resources,” says the report by Ben Parfitt, a Victoria-based researcher whose work was commissioned by the water program at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs.
Mr. Parfitt said the federal government is virtually absent from the discussion, while provinces issue oil companies with individual water-use permits despite having little understanding of the cumulative impacts of increasing drilling activity, no public reporting on the chemicals or amount of industrial water withdrawals and no systematic mapping of the country’s aquifers.
Without a more robust regulatory approach, “rapid shale gas development could potentially threaten important water resources, if not fracture the country’s water security,” Mr. Parfitt wrote in the study, which will be formally released Thursday at a day-long Munk School conference.
The international oil industry is investing heavily in North America shale plays. Just last weekend, Calgary-based Talisman Energy Inc. (TLM-T17.99-0.19-1.05%) announced it is teaming up with Norway’s Statoil ASA for a $1.3-billion (U.S.) acquisition of properties in Texas’ Eagle Ford shale. As well, China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC) said it is investing $1-billion for a one-third stake in Chesapeake Energy Corp.’s Eagle Ford play.
In Canada, companies like Talisman, Encana Corp., (ECA-T30.58-0.10-0.33%) and U.S-based Apache Corp. are planning massive investment in northeastern B.C. and western Alberta, notably in the prolific Horn River and Montney plays. Companies are also eager to develop Quebec’s Utica shale zone and in New Brunswick. As well, the industry is applying the drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques to other oil and unconventional gas fields in Alberta and Saskatchewan – using high-pressured, chemically-treated water to break open tight formations and release the trapped hydrocarbons.
The industry acknowledges that massive expansion of shale development through hydraulic fracturing could threaten water supplies if not properly done, but insist that provincial regulators and the companies themselves are prepared to meet the challenge through water recycling, and tapping salt-water aquifers.
In northeastern B.C., “there is a realization the full-blown development in some of these shale regions is going to tax the water availability if we go forward with a traditional, business-as-usual approach to how water is used,” said Kevin Heffernan, vice-president of Calgary-based Canadian Society for Unconventional Gas, a industry-backed association.
“And certainly the industry is very, very aware that shale-gas development is water intensive and is working hard to find approaches that are going to make sense for the long term,” Mr. Heffernan said in an interview.
But Mr. Parfitt suggests the industry – with the blessing of the B.C. regulator – is forging ahead with development plans in British Columbia and elsewhere while key questions remain unanswered.
While the industry claims there is no evidence that hydraulic fracturing has contaminated aquifers, the researcher cited a number of cases in the United States where ground water was tainted during nearby drilling activity. And there is no requirement in Canada for companies to disclose what chemicals they use in fracturing – as there is in several states.
As well, there has been no assessment in B.C. – or other provinces – of how the industry will be able to dispose of massive amounts of waste water that is produced during the drilling, a key concern regarding possible surface water contamination.
“The pace of the shale gas revolution demands greater scrutiny before more fracture lines appear across the country,” he said.
Learn more in our Investor Learning Centre
Friday, October 15, 2010
Dozens of G20 accused have charges dropped .. Charges withdrawn for 90 Quebecers
Dozens of G20 accused have charges dropped
Charges withdrawn for 90 Quebecers
.
CBC News
The Crown has dropped charges against more than 100 people who were arrested during the G20 summit in Toronto.
Ninety of those defendants were Quebecers who travelled to Toronto to protest the summit, which ran June 26-27. A group of them had taken a bus from Montreal to Toronto that weekend and were sleeping on the floor at the University of Toronto graduate students' union building.
They were rounded up by Toronto police early in the morning of June 27. They were charged with a number of offences, including unlawful assembly and conspiracy-related charges.
All of those people had their charges dropped Thursday because of a lack of evidence. Many of them did not appear in court in person, rather, they celebrated on the steps of the courthouse in downtown Montreal.
Lisa Perrault, a Montreal social worker and a member of the group Anti-Capitalist Convergence, was among those arrested on June 27. She was held at a temporary detention centre for three days before being charged with unlawful assembly and conspiracy to commit an indictable offence.
She said dropping more charges is an admission that they shouldn't have been arrested in the first place.
"It's all to show to people that they are not welcome to say what they have to say because that's what is going to happen to them."
'Charges were frivolous'
Julius Grey, a Montreal lawyer who has been a fierce critic of the policing during the summit, agreed.
"Well, it says what we knew from the start, those charges were frivolous, there was no evidence, that they knew of no conspiracy," he said.
Some 1,100 people were arrested that weekend, but only 308 were eventually charged. Before Thursday, charges were dropped against 69 of those people. To date, only six people have been convicted.
Most of those charged were held in a makeshift detention centre, then released on bail — just like Perrault.
"My rights weren't respected," said Maryce Poisson, who was arrested along with Perrault.
"I felt really stressed about that. And I still had visions about what happened in jail. I think it is something that's really traumatic."
Montreal man arrested
Meanwhile, Toronto police announced Thursday that they had arrested a Montreal man in connection to G20-related vandalism.
Youri Couture, 22, faces six charges, including assaulting a police officer, wearing a disguise with intent to commit an indictable offence and possession of dangerous weapons.
Police allege that during the G20 summit, Couture smashed the windows of a coffee shop, causing more than $18,000 in damages.
Police also allege he assaulted a police officer with a weapon during the meeting of world leaders.
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2010/10/14/g20-charges-dropped685.html#socialcomments#ixzz12Oj2s7gv
Charges withdrawn for 90 Quebecers
.
CBC News
The Crown has dropped charges against more than 100 people who were arrested during the G20 summit in Toronto.
Ninety of those defendants were Quebecers who travelled to Toronto to protest the summit, which ran June 26-27. A group of them had taken a bus from Montreal to Toronto that weekend and were sleeping on the floor at the University of Toronto graduate students' union building.
They were rounded up by Toronto police early in the morning of June 27. They were charged with a number of offences, including unlawful assembly and conspiracy-related charges.
All of those people had their charges dropped Thursday because of a lack of evidence. Many of them did not appear in court in person, rather, they celebrated on the steps of the courthouse in downtown Montreal.
Lisa Perrault, a Montreal social worker and a member of the group Anti-Capitalist Convergence, was among those arrested on June 27. She was held at a temporary detention centre for three days before being charged with unlawful assembly and conspiracy to commit an indictable offence.
She said dropping more charges is an admission that they shouldn't have been arrested in the first place.
"It's all to show to people that they are not welcome to say what they have to say because that's what is going to happen to them."
'Charges were frivolous'
Julius Grey, a Montreal lawyer who has been a fierce critic of the policing during the summit, agreed.
"Well, it says what we knew from the start, those charges were frivolous, there was no evidence, that they knew of no conspiracy," he said.
Some 1,100 people were arrested that weekend, but only 308 were eventually charged. Before Thursday, charges were dropped against 69 of those people. To date, only six people have been convicted.
Most of those charged were held in a makeshift detention centre, then released on bail — just like Perrault.
"My rights weren't respected," said Maryce Poisson, who was arrested along with Perrault.
"I felt really stressed about that. And I still had visions about what happened in jail. I think it is something that's really traumatic."
Montreal man arrested
Meanwhile, Toronto police announced Thursday that they had arrested a Montreal man in connection to G20-related vandalism.
Youri Couture, 22, faces six charges, including assaulting a police officer, wearing a disguise with intent to commit an indictable offence and possession of dangerous weapons.
Police allege that during the G20 summit, Couture smashed the windows of a coffee shop, causing more than $18,000 in damages.
Police also allege he assaulted a police officer with a weapon during the meeting of world leaders.
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2010/10/14/g20-charges-dropped685.html#socialcomments#ixzz12Oj2s7gv
Thursday, October 14, 2010
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service shared information about Abousfian Abdelrazik with "foreign partner agencies" prior to his arrest and detention in Sudan in 2003, the federal government has admitted
CSIS shared Abousfian Abdelrazik information with foreign partner agencies
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service shared information about Abousfian Abdelrazik with "foreign partner agencies" prior to his arrest and detention in Sudan in 2003, the federal government has admitted The Canadian Security Intelligence Service shared information about Abousfian Abdelrazik with “foreign partner agencies” prior to his arrest and detention in Sudan in 2003, the federal government has admitted.
It made the admission in a statement of defence filed this week with the Federal Court in response to Abdelrazik's $27-million lawsuit against the government and Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon.
The 34-page defence firmly denies Canada was complicit in Abdelrazik’s 2003 arrest by Sudanese authorities and asserts Canadian officials took “reasonable steps” to assist in Abdelrazik’s repatriation to Canada.
It also says CSIS did not share any information and intelligence about Abdelrazik with Sudanese authorities before his arrest in that country.
In his lawsuit against the government, Abdelrazik alleges Canada was responsible for his detention in Sudan and violated his constitutional right to come home.
The 47-year-old Sudanese-Canadian spent nearly six years in prison or forced exile in Sudan before the Federal Court ordered the government to repatriate him last year.
Paul Champ, Abdelrazik’s Ottawa lawyer, said Wednesday the decision to share information about Abdelrazik with agencies in other countries was “improper and negligent” because, he believes, it was likely passed on to the Sudanese.
“One way or another, the information that led to his detention and arrest came from Canada,” he said.
The government’s statement says Abdelrazik came to the attention of CSIS in the late 1990s “because of his associations with Montreal-based supporters of Islamist extremism.
“CSIS had reasonable grounds to suspect that (Abdelrazik) constituted a threat to the security of Canada by virtue of suspected links to international terrorism,” the statement of defence says.
CSIS agents interviewed Abdelrazik four times between April 2001 and February 2003 outside his home or at nearby public places.
After his arrest in Sudan, two CSIS agents interviewed Abdelrazik in October 2003. The purpose, the government document says, was to collect information and intelligence on “potential security threats.”
Abdelrazik asked the agents to tell his children in Canada where he was. But the agents declined, the defence statement says.
Champ said the defence corroborates many elements of Abdelrazik’s version of events.
“For the most part, we’re really happy with the defence,” Champ said. That Abdelrazik was able to accurately recall so many meetings and discussions “shows a lot about his credibility,” he said.
One of Abdelrazik’s meetings was with Deepak Obhrai, Cannon’s parliamentary secretary. The two met in March 2008, a month before he sought refuge in the Canadian embassy in Khartoum.
The government’s defence confirms that Abdelrazik told Obhrai he’d been tortured while in custody, lifted his shirt and “briefly pointed to some places on his body.”
In response to Obhrai’s questions, Abdelrazik said he’d been beaten with a hose and made to stand for hours, adding that this was done at the request of Canada, the defence states.
It also says Obhrai asked Abdelrazik about his views on “various conflicts, including Israel and Palestine.”
Champ said the document’s account of the meeting largely corroborates Abdelrazik’s own version.
It also confirms that Obhrai “thought this was a good opportunity to question a Canadian citizen about his views on Israel and Palestine, as if that had any bearing whatsoever on his plight.”
No date has been set to hear the lawsuit, though a case management conference is scheduled for Oct. 26.
Last month, the Federal Court rejected a government motion to throw out parts of the lawsuit, as well as an attempt to have Cannon removed as a defendant.
Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/CSIS+shared+Abousfian+Abdelrazik+information+with+foreign+partner+agencies/3665817/story.html#ixzz12J03B7yx
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service shared information about Abousfian Abdelrazik with "foreign partner agencies" prior to his arrest and detention in Sudan in 2003, the federal government has admitted The Canadian Security Intelligence Service shared information about Abousfian Abdelrazik with “foreign partner agencies” prior to his arrest and detention in Sudan in 2003, the federal government has admitted.
It made the admission in a statement of defence filed this week with the Federal Court in response to Abdelrazik's $27-million lawsuit against the government and Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon.
The 34-page defence firmly denies Canada was complicit in Abdelrazik’s 2003 arrest by Sudanese authorities and asserts Canadian officials took “reasonable steps” to assist in Abdelrazik’s repatriation to Canada.
It also says CSIS did not share any information and intelligence about Abdelrazik with Sudanese authorities before his arrest in that country.
In his lawsuit against the government, Abdelrazik alleges Canada was responsible for his detention in Sudan and violated his constitutional right to come home.
The 47-year-old Sudanese-Canadian spent nearly six years in prison or forced exile in Sudan before the Federal Court ordered the government to repatriate him last year.
Paul Champ, Abdelrazik’s Ottawa lawyer, said Wednesday the decision to share information about Abdelrazik with agencies in other countries was “improper and negligent” because, he believes, it was likely passed on to the Sudanese.
“One way or another, the information that led to his detention and arrest came from Canada,” he said.
The government’s statement says Abdelrazik came to the attention of CSIS in the late 1990s “because of his associations with Montreal-based supporters of Islamist extremism.
“CSIS had reasonable grounds to suspect that (Abdelrazik) constituted a threat to the security of Canada by virtue of suspected links to international terrorism,” the statement of defence says.
CSIS agents interviewed Abdelrazik four times between April 2001 and February 2003 outside his home or at nearby public places.
After his arrest in Sudan, two CSIS agents interviewed Abdelrazik in October 2003. The purpose, the government document says, was to collect information and intelligence on “potential security threats.”
Abdelrazik asked the agents to tell his children in Canada where he was. But the agents declined, the defence statement says.
Champ said the defence corroborates many elements of Abdelrazik’s version of events.
“For the most part, we’re really happy with the defence,” Champ said. That Abdelrazik was able to accurately recall so many meetings and discussions “shows a lot about his credibility,” he said.
One of Abdelrazik’s meetings was with Deepak Obhrai, Cannon’s parliamentary secretary. The two met in March 2008, a month before he sought refuge in the Canadian embassy in Khartoum.
The government’s defence confirms that Abdelrazik told Obhrai he’d been tortured while in custody, lifted his shirt and “briefly pointed to some places on his body.”
In response to Obhrai’s questions, Abdelrazik said he’d been beaten with a hose and made to stand for hours, adding that this was done at the request of Canada, the defence states.
It also says Obhrai asked Abdelrazik about his views on “various conflicts, including Israel and Palestine.”
Champ said the document’s account of the meeting largely corroborates Abdelrazik’s own version.
It also confirms that Obhrai “thought this was a good opportunity to question a Canadian citizen about his views on Israel and Palestine, as if that had any bearing whatsoever on his plight.”
No date has been set to hear the lawsuit, though a case management conference is scheduled for Oct. 26.
Last month, the Federal Court rejected a government motion to throw out parts of the lawsuit, as well as an attempt to have Cannon removed as a defendant.
Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/CSIS+shared+Abousfian+Abdelrazik+information+with+foreign+partner+agencies/3665817/story.html#ixzz12J03B7yx
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)